Air quality and health co-benefits of bus electrification: evidence from a UK metropolitan area

Air pollution in cities is a critical environmental and public health concern, where achieving legal limit values and progress towards WHO health-based guidelines may be challenging. Transportation is one of the leading causes of air pollution in urban areas, and hence public transportation systems such as low / zero tailpipe emission buses play a crucial role in reducing toxic emissions to air, and improving sustainable mobility and social connectivity. In addition, as combustion emissions from transport also negatively impact the climate, a move to transportation systems that can be powered using green energy are necessary. Responding to the climate severity and its link to urban air pollution, a global push for sustainable transportation is occurring. This study employed an advanced street scale air quality dispersion modelling system to assess the impact of five hypothetical bus fleet electrification scenarios (i.e. 20 %, 40 %, 60 %, 80 % and 100 % electrification) on the changes to air pollution levels in a UK metropolitan area (West Midlands). Modelled spatial distributions of air pollutant concentrations have been integrated into the West Midlands Air Quality Lifecourse Assessment tool for the assessment of associated air quality related health effects, generating electoral ward level health and economic outcomes. Potential air quality improvements were observed in nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>) concentration up to 13 μg m<sup>-3</sup> (or 27 %), and in PM<sub>2.5</sub> (particulate matter with diameter less than 2.5 μm) concentration up to 0.5 μg m<sup>-3</sup> (or 4 %). The modest improvements in regional health considering only air quality related impacts on disease incidence (up to 3.1 % in at attributable burden of asthma diagnoses over 10 years) and mortality (up to 0.7 % in deaths prevented over 10 years) were also observed. This study provides evidence for the air quality and health co-benefits of the carbon transportation systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment International
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2026.110066
Primary Topic
Air Quality and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Air quality and health co-benefits of bus electrification: evidence from a UK metropolitan area

Suzanne Bartington, William J. Bloss, Hang Ye, Zongbo Shi et al.
Environment International
Air Quality and Health Impacts
article

Air quality and health co-benefits of bus electrification: evidence from a UK metropolitan area

Suzanne Bartington, William J. Bloss, Hang Ye, Zongbo Shi, Tanmay Gojamgunde, James Hall, Jian Zhong, Jenny Stocker
article en

Abstract

Air pollution in cities is a critical environmental and public health concern, where achieving legal limit values and progress towards WHO health-based guidelines may be challenging. Transportation is one of the leading causes of air pollution in urban areas, and hence public transportation systems such as low / zero tailpipe emission buses play a crucial role in reducing toxic emissions to air, and improving sustainable mobility and social connectivity. In addition, as combustion emissions from transport also negatively impact the climate, a move to transportation systems that can be powered using green energy are necessary. Responding to the climate severity and its link to urban air pollution, a global push for sustainable transportation is occurring. This study employed an advanced street scale air quality dispersion modelling system to assess the impact of five hypothetical bus fleet electrification scenarios (i.e. 20 %, 40 %, 60 %, 80 % and 100 % electrification) on the changes to air pollution levels in a UK metropolitan area (West Midlands). Modelled spatial distributions of air pollutant concentrations have been integrated into the West Midlands Air Quality Lifecourse Assessment tool for the assessment of associated air quality related health effects, generating electoral ward level health and economic outcomes. Potential air quality improvements were observed in nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>) concentration up to 13 μg m<sup>-3</sup> (or 27 %), and in PM<sub>2.5</sub> (particulate matter with diameter less than 2.5 μm) concentration up to 0.5 μg m<sup>-3</sup> (or 4 %). The modest improvements in regional health considering only air quality related impacts on disease incidence (up to 3.1 % in at attributable burden of asthma diagnoses over 10 years) and mortality (up to 0.7 % in deaths prevented over 10 years) were also observed. This study provides evidence for the air quality and health co-benefits of the carbon transportation systems.

Environment InternationalVol. 208
Cambridge Environmental Research Consultants (United Kingdom) (GB), University of Greenwich (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Air Quality and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.