Earnings Claims and Disclaimers in Multilevel Marketing: Testing the Impact of Self-Regulatory Guidance

This research assesses the adoption of self-regulatory guidance in the multilevel marketing (MLM) industry as it relates to earnings claims and disclaimers and studies the impact of disclaimers embedded in MLM promotional material. Based on a review of over 2,000 MLM marketing materials with atypical claims, Study 1 finds that the industry's own self-regulatory disclaimer guidance has not been adopted by MLM firms. Instead, MLM firms overwhelmingly use no disclaimers or vague, nonprominent disclaimers. Study 2 tests the impact of disclaimers that align with actual MLM industry practice against disclaimers aligned with self-regulatory guidance, both to assess the impact of current practice and to evaluate the “what if” scenario of guidance adoption. Results indicate that actual disclaimers have no impact, while guidance-aligned disclaimers do impact consumer judgments and interest. As there are multiple differences between actual disclaimers and those aligned with self-regulatory guidance, Study 3 tests the relative importance of disclaimer content and prominence. Results indicate that both content and prominence are tied to disclaimer impact. Findings inform the self-regulatory and regulatory framework for the MLM industry and disclaimer design and content.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Policy & Marketing
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07439156261416351
Primary Topic
Securities Regulation and Market Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Earnings Claims and Disclaimers in Multilevel Marketing: Testing the Impact of Self-Regulatory Guidance

Sarah J. Greenman, Samantha Snyder, Stacie A. Bosley, Kiana Kotasek
Journal of Public Policy & Marketing
Securities Regulation and Market Practices
article

Earnings Claims and Disclaimers in Multilevel Marketing: Testing the Impact of Self-Regulatory Guidance

Sarah J. Greenman, Samantha Snyder, Stacie A. Bosley, Kiana Kotasek
article en

Abstract

This research assesses the adoption of self-regulatory guidance in the multilevel marketing (MLM) industry as it relates to earnings claims and disclaimers and studies the impact of disclaimers embedded in MLM promotional material. Based on a review of over 2,000 MLM marketing materials with atypical claims, Study 1 finds that the industry's own self-regulatory disclaimer guidance has not been adopted by MLM firms. Instead, MLM firms overwhelmingly use no disclaimers or vague, nonprominent disclaimers. Study 2 tests the impact of disclaimers that align with actual MLM industry practice against disclaimers aligned with self-regulatory guidance, both to assess the impact of current practice and to evaluate the “what if” scenario of guidance adoption. Results indicate that actual disclaimers have no impact, while guidance-aligned disclaimers do impact consumer judgments and interest. As there are multiple differences between actual disclaimers and those aligned with self-regulatory guidance, Study 3 tests the relative importance of disclaimer content and prominence. Results indicate that both content and prominence are tied to disclaimer impact. Findings inform the self-regulatory and regulatory framework for the MLM industry and disclaimer design and content.

Journal of Public Policy & MarketingVol. 45(2)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Securities Regulation and Market Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.