Efficacy of Plasmid DNA Delivery into Mice by Intradermal Injections Alone and Facilitated by Sonoporation or Electroporation

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: A key disadvantage of DNA vaccines is ineffective uptake of plasmid DNA, resulting in low immunogenicity. A way to overcome it is forced DNA delivery, which requires specialized equipment and/or reagents. Effective delivery of plasmids without specialized devices or using commonly available ones would significantly increase DNA vaccine applicability. Here, we delivered DNA by intradermal injections, facilitating them by optimized sonoporation (SP) or electroporation (EP), and we compared these methods by their capacity to support the production of foreign proteins in mice. <b>Methods</b>: DNA delivery was optimized using the plasmid encoding firefly luciferase (Luc) (pVaxLuc). Luc production was assessed by bioluminescence imaging (BLI) (IVIS, PerkinElmer, Shelton, CT, USA; LumoTrace Fluo, Abisense, Dolgoprudny, Russia). Female BALB/c mice were injected intradermally (id) with pVaxLuc in phosphate buffers of varying ionic strengths. Injection sites were subjected to SP (Intelect Mobile, Chattanooga, UK) or EP (CUY21EDITII, BEX Co., Tokyo, Japan) or left untreated. Optimal delivery protocols were selected based on the highest in vivo levels of photon flux according to BLI. Optimal protocols for id injections with/without EP were applied to DNA-immunized mice with HIV-1 clade A reverse transcriptase. Antibody response induced by DNA immunization was assessed by ELISA. <b>Results</b>: The optimal phosphate buffers for id delivery had ionic strengths from 81 to 163 mmol/L. The optimal SP regimen included an acoustic pressure of 2.4 W/cm<sup>2</sup> applied in a duty cycle of 2%. The optimal EP regimen included bipolar driving pulses of 100 V, a pulse duration of 10 ms, and an interval between the pulses of 20 ms. Optimized DNA delivery by id/SP injection was inferior to both id/EP and id alone. DNA immunization with HIV-1 RT by id injections induced anti-RT antibodies in a titer of 10<sup>4</sup> and by id/EP in a titer of 10<sup>5</sup>. <b>Conclusions</b>: Electroporation of the sites of id DNA injection provided the highest levels of production of luciferase reporters and induced a strong antibody response against HIV-1 RT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vaccines
Published
2026-01-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14010082
Primary Topic
Microbial Inactivation Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of Plasmid DNA Delivery into Mice by Intradermal Injections Alone and Facilitated by Sonoporation or Electroporation

Maria G. Belikova, Anastasia Latanova, E O Bayurova, Oleg Latyshev et al.
Vaccines
Microbial Inactivation Methods
article

Efficacy of Plasmid DNA Delivery into Mice by Intradermal Injections Alone and Facilitated by Sonoporation or Electroporation

Maria G. Belikova, Anastasia Latanova, E O Bayurova, Oleg Latyshev, Ilya Gordeychuk, Daria Avdoshina, Vladimir Valuev-Elliston, Alla Zhitkevich, Galina Frolova
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: A key disadvantage of DNA vaccines is ineffective uptake of plasmid DNA, resulting in low immunogenicity. A way to overcome it is forced DNA delivery, which requires specialized equipment and/or reagents. Effective delivery of plasmids without specialized devices or using commonly available ones would significantly increase DNA vaccine applicability. Here, we delivered DNA by intradermal injections, facilitating them by optimized sonoporation (SP) or electroporation (EP), and we compared these methods by their capacity to support the production of foreign proteins in mice. <b>Methods</b>: DNA delivery was optimized using the plasmid encoding firefly luciferase (Luc) (pVaxLuc). Luc production was assessed by bioluminescence imaging (BLI) (IVIS, PerkinElmer, Shelton, CT, USA; LumoTrace Fluo, Abisense, Dolgoprudny, Russia). Female BALB/c mice were injected intradermally (id) with pVaxLuc in phosphate buffers of varying ionic strengths. Injection sites were subjected to SP (Intelect Mobile, Chattanooga, UK) or EP (CUY21EDITII, BEX Co., Tokyo, Japan) or left untreated. Optimal delivery protocols were selected based on the highest in vivo levels of photon flux according to BLI. Optimal protocols for id injections with/without EP were applied to DNA-immunized mice with HIV-1 clade A reverse transcriptase. Antibody response induced by DNA immunization was assessed by ELISA. <b>Results</b>: The optimal phosphate buffers for id delivery had ionic strengths from 81 to 163 mmol/L. The optimal SP regimen included an acoustic pressure of 2.4 W/cm<sup>2</sup> applied in a duty cycle of 2%. The optimal EP regimen included bipolar driving pulses of 100 V, a pulse duration of 10 ms, and an interval between the pulses of 20 ms. Optimized DNA delivery by id/SP injection was inferior to both id/EP and id alone. DNA immunization with HIV-1 RT by id injections induced anti-RT antibodies in a titer of 10<sup>4</sup> and by id/EP in a titer of 10<sup>5</sup>. <b>Conclusions</b>: Electroporation of the sites of id DNA injection provided the highest levels of production of luciferase reporters and induced a strong antibody response against HIV-1 RT.

VaccinesVol. 14(1)
Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology (RU), Russian Academy of Sciences (RU), Sechenov University (RU), Gamalei Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology (RU)
Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Russian Academy of Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Microbial Inactivation Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.