Pansharpening largely preserves the normalized difference vegetation index: a multi-sensor comparison with PRISMA, Landsat 9, and field spectroscopy

Pansharpening is widely used to increase the spatial resolution of satellite imagery, yet its effects on vegetation indices derived from hyperspectral sensors remain poorly quantified. This study tests how five standard software pansharpening algorithms alter Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) values derived from PRISMA hyperspectral and Landsat 9 multispectral data. We analysed 14 spectrally homogeneous plots within a 6.5 km 2 agricultural site in the Czech Republic in 2022 using acquisitions from Landsat 9 (04 August), PRISMA (07 August), ASD FieldSpec 4 field spectrometer, and UAV-borne MicaSense RedEdge-MX measurements (08 August). Across algorithms, deviations in NDVI relative to native imagery were statistically insignificant for both sensors (Landsat 9 and PRISMA); however, algorithm choice affected accuracy. The Principal Component (PC) Nearest Neighbor method had the largest errors (MAE = 0.093 for PRISMA; 0.078 for Landsat 9) and, for PRISMA, a positive bias relative to FieldSpec 4 (bias = +0.111). In contrast, NN Diffuse and Local Mean and Variance Matching (LMVM) produced the lowest errors. For PRISMA, NN Diffuse achieved an MAE of 0.049 and a bias of +0.040, while LMVM yielded an MAE of 0.050 and a bias of +0.016. For Landsat 9, NN Diffuse reached an MAE of 0.052 and a bias of +0.014, and LMVM produced an MAE of 0.059 and a bias of −0.018. UAV-derived NDVI agreed less with ASD FieldSpec 4 than the native satellite data (MAE = 0.056). Our results provide the first empirical assessment of pansharpening effects on PRISMA hyperspectral NDVI and demonstrate that, with robust algorithms and careful preprocessing, pansharpening does not materially distort NDVI. While the study is restricted to a single site, a single growing season, and one vegetation index, it highlights methodological considerations that can inform broader applications of hyperspectral pansharpening not only in vegetation monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Remote Sensing
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2025.1713895
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pansharpening largely preserves the normalized difference vegetation index: a multi-sensor comparison with PRISMA, Landsat 9, and field spectroscopy

David Moravec, Jiří Rouš, Tomáš Klouček, Jan Komárek et al.
Frontiers in Remote Sensing
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
article

Pansharpening largely preserves the normalized difference vegetation index: a multi-sensor comparison with PRISMA, Landsat 9, and field spectroscopy

David Moravec, Jiří Rouš, Tomáš Klouček, Jan Komárek, Jan Procházka
article en

Abstract

Pansharpening is widely used to increase the spatial resolution of satellite imagery, yet its effects on vegetation indices derived from hyperspectral sensors remain poorly quantified. This study tests how five standard software pansharpening algorithms alter Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) values derived from PRISMA hyperspectral and Landsat 9 multispectral data. We analysed 14 spectrally homogeneous plots within a 6.5 km 2 agricultural site in the Czech Republic in 2022 using acquisitions from Landsat 9 (04 August), PRISMA (07 August), ASD FieldSpec 4 field spectrometer, and UAV-borne MicaSense RedEdge-MX measurements (08 August). Across algorithms, deviations in NDVI relative to native imagery were statistically insignificant for both sensors (Landsat 9 and PRISMA); however, algorithm choice affected accuracy. The Principal Component (PC) Nearest Neighbor method had the largest errors (MAE = 0.093 for PRISMA; 0.078 for Landsat 9) and, for PRISMA, a positive bias relative to FieldSpec 4 (bias = +0.111). In contrast, NN Diffuse and Local Mean and Variance Matching (LMVM) produced the lowest errors. For PRISMA, NN Diffuse achieved an MAE of 0.049 and a bias of +0.040, while LMVM yielded an MAE of 0.050 and a bias of +0.016. For Landsat 9, NN Diffuse reached an MAE of 0.052 and a bias of +0.014, and LMVM produced an MAE of 0.059 and a bias of −0.018. UAV-derived NDVI agreed less with ASD FieldSpec 4 than the native satellite data (MAE = 0.056). Our results provide the first empirical assessment of pansharpening effects on PRISMA hyperspectral NDVI and demonstrate that, with robust algorithms and careful preprocessing, pansharpening does not materially distort NDVI. While the study is restricted to a single site, a single growing season, and one vegetation index, it highlights methodological considerations that can inform broader applications of hyperspectral pansharpening not only in vegetation monitoring.

Frontiers in Remote SensingVol. 6
Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CZ)
Česká Zemědělská Univerzita v Praze
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.