Dropout, Attrition, Adherence, and Compliance in Mood Monitoring and Ambulatory Assessment Studies for Depression and Bipolar Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Reporting of attrition and adherence to ambulatory assessments was not systematic nor universal, and until it is, analyses are unlikely to demonstrate clear conclusions. We found very high heterogeneity and evidence of publication bias, and this limited the certainty of our conclusions. Financial incentives may increase adherence, and attrition may be lower in digital than analogue studies of mood monitoring. There was no statistically significant difference in adherence and attrition between studies of passive and active ambulatory assessments. Reminders of mood monitoring increased attrition and decreased adherence, but the results may be confounded by longer length of follow-up versus other studies.
Authors
- Laurence Astill Wright (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8324-1229)
- Richard Morriss
- James Roe
- Boliang Guo
Institutions
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Institute of Mental Health (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- JMIR Mental Health
- Published
- 2026-01-12
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.2196/83765
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 80.21