Balancing Diagnostic Sensitivity and Operational Efficiency in MRSA Screening: A Study of Pooled Multi-Site Swabs With and without Viral Transport Media Using GeneXpert®

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) remains a significant cause of healthcare-associated infections. Early identification of colonized individuals upon hospital admission is essential for effective infection control. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of pooled MRSA screening using the GeneXpert®system (Cepheid) under two conditions: with and without viral transport media (VTM). The goal was to assess the sensitivity of pooling strategies while minimizing reagent use, processing time, and laboratory workload. Swabs were collected from three anatomical sites, the axilla, groin, and nares, from newly admitted patients. Samples were pooled either with VTM or without VTM and then tested using the Xpert®MRSA assay. Experiments were conducted using three pooling configurations: (1) one positive and two negative swabs, (2) two positive and one negative swab, and (3) three positive swabs. The limit of detection (LoD) was also assessed for both VTM and non-VTM conditions through serial dilutions of known MRSA concentrations. In non-VTM pools, positive detection rates were 55%, 80%, and 100% for pools containing one, two, and three MRSA-positive swabs, respectively. In VTM pools, detection rates improved to 75%, 90%, and 100% for the same configurations. The LoD analysis confirmed that MRSA was detectable at low concentrations in both VTM- and non-VTM-pooled samples, with slightly higher sensitivity in the VTM group. No false negatives were observed in pools containing three positive samples under either condition. Pooling of MRSA screening samples using the GeneXpert®system is a viable strategy to reduce testing costs and workload. Detection sensitivity increases with bacterial load, and the use of VTM enhances performance, particularly in scenarios with low-prevalence. These findings support the implementation of pooled MRSA screening as an efficient and reliable method in hospital admission protocols.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of King Abdulaziz University-Medical Sciences
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64064/1658-4279.1023
Primary Topic
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Balancing Diagnostic Sensitivity and Operational Efficiency in MRSA Screening: A Study of Pooled Multi-Site Swabs With and without Viral Transport Media Using GeneXpert®

Fahd A Alhejili, Salman Salem Alsharif, Eman A. A. Mulla, Rehab G. Alqurashi et al.
Journal of King Abdulaziz University-Medical Sciences
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
article

Balancing Diagnostic Sensitivity and Operational Efficiency in MRSA Screening: A Study of Pooled Multi-Site Swabs With and without Viral Transport Media Using GeneXpert®

Fahd A Alhejili, Salman Salem Alsharif, Eman A. A. Mulla, Rehab G. Alqurashi, Salwa Andejani, Rabab H Moaminah, Daee Almalki, LAMIA H. MOHAMMED, Ghazi Saad Alkhaldi, Fawaz F. Qasim, Afnan O. Baharthi, Atiyah A. Alzahrany, Abeer S. Alqarni, Majed M. Shaikh, Noha K. Alqurashi, Eman A. Bukhari, Khalid M. Alquthami, Atif A. Jahri, Khulud A. Alhazmi, Mansour H. Alqasmi, Ghadeer S. Areeshi, Tahani O. Roomy, Saeed A. Badhdah, Ahmed A. Khan, Baidaa S. Basudan, Basem A. Jawa, Abdullah A. Marzogi
article en

Abstract

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) remains a significant cause of healthcare-associated infections. Early identification of colonized individuals upon hospital admission is essential for effective infection control. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of pooled MRSA screening using the GeneXpert®system (Cepheid) under two conditions: with and without viral transport media (VTM). The goal was to assess the sensitivity of pooling strategies while minimizing reagent use, processing time, and laboratory workload. Swabs were collected from three anatomical sites, the axilla, groin, and nares, from newly admitted patients. Samples were pooled either with VTM or without VTM and then tested using the Xpert®MRSA assay. Experiments were conducted using three pooling configurations: (1) one positive and two negative swabs, (2) two positive and one negative swab, and (3) three positive swabs. The limit of detection (LoD) was also assessed for both VTM and non-VTM conditions through serial dilutions of known MRSA concentrations. In non-VTM pools, positive detection rates were 55%, 80%, and 100% for pools containing one, two, and three MRSA-positive swabs, respectively. In VTM pools, detection rates improved to 75%, 90%, and 100% for the same configurations. The LoD analysis confirmed that MRSA was detectable at low concentrations in both VTM- and non-VTM-pooled samples, with slightly higher sensitivity in the VTM group. No false negatives were observed in pools containing three positive samples under either condition. Pooling of MRSA screening samples using the GeneXpert®system is a viable strategy to reduce testing costs and workload. Detection sensitivity increases with bacterial load, and the use of VTM enhances performance, particularly in scenarios with low-prevalence. These findings support the implementation of pooled MRSA screening as an efficient and reliable method in hospital admission protocols.

Journal of King Abdulaziz University-Medical SciencesVol. 32(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.