Navigating the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive: Strategic Implications for US Companies

The European Union’s (“EU”) Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (“CSDDD” or the “Directive”) introduces new human rights and environmental obligations that reshape global corporate governance. This paper explores its impact on US companies, with a particular focus on compliance strategies under both direct and indirect applicability. It contrasts tactical compliance, which emphasizes risk mitigation while meeting minimum legal requirements, against strategic compliance, where companies use sustainability to gain a competitive edge in the market. This paper highlights how varying enforcement levels across EU Member States may incentivize companies to “forum shop” or choose jurisdictions with more relaxed enforcement. It also explores the concept of “loyalty” in compliance, with companies adopting either minimal or substantive strategies based on enforcement dynamics. This paper concludes with the argument that US companies adopting a strategic compliance approach are better positioned to lead in global sustainability, build stakeholder trust, and drive innovation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Michigan Business & Entrepreneurial Law Review
Published
2026-01-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36639/mbelr.15.1.navigating
Primary Topic
Corporate Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive: Strategic Implications for US Companies

Sharon Oded, Silvia Ciacchi, Michael Gerbert Faure
Michigan Business & Entrepreneurial Law Review
Corporate Law and Human Rights
article

Navigating the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive: Strategic Implications for US Companies

Sharon Oded, Silvia Ciacchi, Michael Gerbert Faure
article en

Abstract

The European Union’s (“EU”) Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (“CSDDD” or the “Directive”) introduces new human rights and environmental obligations that reshape global corporate governance. This paper explores its impact on US companies, with a particular focus on compliance strategies under both direct and indirect applicability. It contrasts tactical compliance, which emphasizes risk mitigation while meeting minimum legal requirements, against strategic compliance, where companies use sustainability to gain a competitive edge in the market. This paper highlights how varying enforcement levels across EU Member States may incentivize companies to “forum shop” or choose jurisdictions with more relaxed enforcement. It also explores the concept of “loyalty” in compliance, with companies adopting either minimal or substantive strategies based on enforcement dynamics. This paper concludes with the argument that US companies adopting a strategic compliance approach are better positioned to lead in global sustainability, build stakeholder trust, and drive innovation.

Michigan Business & Entrepreneurial Law Review
Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Corporate Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.