AI regulatory strategies for digital sovereignty: The role of geopolitics and technological disparities

Abstract This article examines the European Union’s (EU) strategy to assert digital sovereignty through stringent artificial intelligence (AI) regulation, situated within evolving geopolitical dynamics and widening technological disparities with the United States (US). A game-theoretic model is developed to analyze the strategic dilemma confronting EU regulators, who must balance the protection of domestic market share for local firms against maintaining access to leading AI technologies. The analysis shows that stringent regulation constitutes a rational strategy only when it disproportionately constrains foreign firms and when foreign technological advantages in the domestic market are significant but not overwhelming. Applying this framework to the EU AI Act’s provisions on general-purpose AI, the study illustrates that the effectiveness of the EU’s approach is contingent on its redistributive effect on domestic market power, the level of US technological competitiveness, and the state of transatlantic cooperation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronic Markets
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-025-00870-z
Primary Topic
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI regulatory strategies for digital sovereignty: The role of geopolitics and technological disparities

Keith Jin Deng Chan, Gleb Papyshev
Electronic Markets
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
article

AI regulatory strategies for digital sovereignty: The role of geopolitics and technological disparities

Keith Jin Deng Chan, Gleb Papyshev
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines the European Union’s (EU) strategy to assert digital sovereignty through stringent artificial intelligence (AI) regulation, situated within evolving geopolitical dynamics and widening technological disparities with the United States (US). A game-theoretic model is developed to analyze the strategic dilemma confronting EU regulators, who must balance the protection of domestic market share for local firms against maintaining access to leading AI technologies. The analysis shows that stringent regulation constitutes a rational strategy only when it disproportionately constrains foreign firms and when foreign technological advantages in the domestic market are significant but not overwhelming. Applying this framework to the EU AI Act’s provisions on general-purpose AI, the study illustrates that the effectiveness of the EU’s approach is contingent on its redistributive effect on domestic market power, the level of US technological competitiveness, and the state of transatlantic cooperation.

Electronic MarketsVol. 36(1)
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AI regulatory strategies for digital sovereignty: The role of geopolitics and technological disparities — Keith Jin Deng Chan, Gleb Papyshev · Electronic Markets (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS