Study on the Influence of Three Current Forms on the Cathodic Protection Effect of Pipeline Intelligent Test Piles

In order to explore the influence of different current forms on the protection effect of cathodic protection systems for intelligent test piles of oil and gas gathering and transportation pipelines, X80 steel was taken as the research object to simulate the soil corrosion environment, and cathodic protection performance test experiments were carried out under three current forms: direct current (DC), conventional pulse (P) and high-frequency pulse (HP). Through a polarization curve test, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) analysis, surface morphology observation and corrosion rate test, the effects of three current forms on cathodic polarization effect, polarization resistance, corrosion product composition and protection efficiency were compared. The results show that high-frequency pulse current can make the pipeline steel reach the protection potential in a shorter time, and under the same average current density, its polarization resistance is 23.6% and 15.8% higher than that of DC and conventional pulse, respectively. The anti-interference ability of conventional pulse current is better than that of DC. In the presence of stray current, the fluctuation amplitude of protection potential is only 21.1% of DC. The protection stability of DC is good, but the polarization speed is slow, and the phenomenon of “over protection” easily occurs in the process of long-term protection. Combined with economic analysis, high-frequency pulse current has significant advantages in high-corrosion-risk environments. Conventional pulse is suitable for stray current interference areas, while DC is more suitable for long-distance pipeline protection with low corrosion risk. The research results can provide a theoretical basis and technical support for the selection of the current form of pipeline cathodic protection systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Coatings
Published
2026-01-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings16010099
Primary Topic
Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Study on the Influence of Three Current Forms on the Cathodic Protection Effect of Pipeline Intelligent Test Piles

Naixin Lv, Lei Wang, Yinjuan Sun, Weijie An et al.
Coatings
Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition
article

Study on the Influence of Three Current Forms on the Cathodic Protection Effect of Pipeline Intelligent Test Piles

Naixin Lv, Lei Wang, Yinjuan Sun, Weijie An, Yuntao Xi, Han Dong, Yun Gao, Man Liu, Jufeng Huang
article en

Abstract

In order to explore the influence of different current forms on the protection effect of cathodic protection systems for intelligent test piles of oil and gas gathering and transportation pipelines, X80 steel was taken as the research object to simulate the soil corrosion environment, and cathodic protection performance test experiments were carried out under three current forms: direct current (DC), conventional pulse (P) and high-frequency pulse (HP). Through a polarization curve test, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) analysis, surface morphology observation and corrosion rate test, the effects of three current forms on cathodic polarization effect, polarization resistance, corrosion product composition and protection efficiency were compared. The results show that high-frequency pulse current can make the pipeline steel reach the protection potential in a shorter time, and under the same average current density, its polarization resistance is 23.6% and 15.8% higher than that of DC and conventional pulse, respectively. The anti-interference ability of conventional pulse current is better than that of DC. In the presence of stray current, the fluctuation amplitude of protection potential is only 21.1% of DC. The protection stability of DC is good, but the polarization speed is slow, and the phenomenon of “over protection” easily occurs in the process of long-term protection. Combined with economic analysis, high-frequency pulse current has significant advantages in high-corrosion-risk environments. Conventional pulse is suitable for stray current interference areas, while DC is more suitable for long-distance pipeline protection with low corrosion risk. The research results can provide a theoretical basis and technical support for the selection of the current form of pipeline cathodic protection systems.

CoatingsVol. 16(1)
Xi'an Shiyou University (CN), China National Petroleum Corporation (China) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.