MRI, PET/CT and PET/MRI Fusion in the Assessment of Lymph Node Metastases in Head and Neck Cancer

<b>Background/Objective:</b> The aim of the present study is to compare diagnostic accuracies of MRI, PET/CT and fused PET/MRI in the assessment of cervical lymph nodes in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). <b>Methods:</b> Imaging data of 37 patients who underwent MRI, PET/CT, and surgery at our center were retrospectively merged into PET/MR images. Histopathological results of neck dissections and lymph node resections served as the gold standard. <b>Results:</b> MRI and PET/CT were performed on the same day. The mean interval between imaging and surgery was 20 (±19.5) days. All three imaging modalities identified the same number of true positive and false negative cases, resulting in identical sensitivity estimates of 66.7%. Specificities were 90.9% for MRI, 95.5% for PET/CT, and 100% for PET/MRI. The corresponding positive predictive values (PPVs) were 83.3%, 80.7%, and 81.5%, while the negative predictive values (NPVs) were 80.0%, 90.9%, and 100%, respectively. Ten false results are further analyzed regarding side and level of the affected lymph node, and intersections of the three modalities are displayed. In 12 (32.4%) cases, additional findings are depicted in PET/CT, 5 (13.5%) of which are histologically confirmed to be further malignancies. <b>Conclusions:</b> Software-based PET/MRI is an easy-to-perform procedure and provides valuable clinical information in select clinical questions. Furthermore, whole-body acquisition by PET/CT leads to a notable number of additional malignant diagnoses, which especially favors its use in high-risk patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16020252
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MRI, PET/CT and PET/MRI Fusion in the Assessment of Lymph Node Metastases in Head and Neck Cancer

Christian Asel, Michael Mayrhofer, Paul Martin Zwittag, Nina Rubicz et al.
Diagnostics
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
article

MRI, PET/CT and PET/MRI Fusion in the Assessment of Lymph Node Metastases in Head and Neck Cancer

Christian Asel, Michael Mayrhofer, Paul Martin Zwittag, Nina Rubicz, Nikolaus Poier-Fabian, Jan Maximilian Janssen, Michael Gabriel, Veronika Moser, Thomas Ziegler, Hanna Cristurean
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objective:</b> The aim of the present study is to compare diagnostic accuracies of MRI, PET/CT and fused PET/MRI in the assessment of cervical lymph nodes in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). <b>Methods:</b> Imaging data of 37 patients who underwent MRI, PET/CT, and surgery at our center were retrospectively merged into PET/MR images. Histopathological results of neck dissections and lymph node resections served as the gold standard. <b>Results:</b> MRI and PET/CT were performed on the same day. The mean interval between imaging and surgery was 20 (±19.5) days. All three imaging modalities identified the same number of true positive and false negative cases, resulting in identical sensitivity estimates of 66.7%. Specificities were 90.9% for MRI, 95.5% for PET/CT, and 100% for PET/MRI. The corresponding positive predictive values (PPVs) were 83.3%, 80.7%, and 81.5%, while the negative predictive values (NPVs) were 80.0%, 90.9%, and 100%, respectively. Ten false results are further analyzed regarding side and level of the affected lymph node, and intersections of the three modalities are displayed. In 12 (32.4%) cases, additional findings are depicted in PET/CT, 5 (13.5%) of which are histologically confirmed to be further malignancies. <b>Conclusions:</b> Software-based PET/MRI is an easy-to-perform procedure and provides valuable clinical information in select clinical questions. Furthermore, whole-body acquisition by PET/CT leads to a notable number of additional malignant diagnoses, which especially favors its use in high-risk patients.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(2)
Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT), Kepler Universitätsklinikum (AT)
Kepler Universitätsklinikum
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.