Neurosensory Disturbances and Recovery Patterns in Orthognathic Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis of 579 Cases From a Tertiary Referral Center

Background Le Fort I osteotomy and sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) are the most commonly performed procedures for correcting skeletal jaw deformities. Despite improved safety, neurosensory disturbances remain a significant postoperative complication. Comprehensive quantitative assessment of sensory recovery and identification of risk factors are essential for optimizing patient counseling and surgical planning. Methods A total of 579 cases with a complete six-month follow-up were analyzed from 642 consecutive orthognathic surgeries performed between 1 April 2020 and 31 March 2025 at the Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital. Neurosensory function was assessed using Semmes-Weinstein (SW) monofilament testing at one week and at one, two, three, and six months postoperatively. Normal sensation was defined as the detection of SW 1.65 monofilament, and severe hypoesthesia as failure to detect SW 4.56 or higher. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and multivariate logistic regression. Results Intraoperative complication rates were 0.4% in the Le Fort I group (n=225) and 2.5% in the SSRO group (n=354). Postoperatively, infraorbital nerve paresthesia occurred in 36/225 cases (16.0%), while inferior alveolar nerve paresthesia occurred in 139/354 left sides (39.3%) and 112/354 right sides (31.6%). Six-month neurosensory recovery rates were 94.4% in the Le Fort I group and 92.9% in the SSRO group, with >85% of recoveries occurring within the first three months. Mandibular advancement of ≥5 mm was the most significant independent risk factor for bilateral inferior alveolar nerve disturbance (left: <i>p</i>=0.000292; right: <i>p</i>=0.00196). Other complications included maxillary sinus mucosal thickening (14.2%) and metal plate fracture (1.1%). Conclusion Orthognathic surgery at this tertiary center demonstrated low intraoperative risk and excellent neurosensory recovery. However, mandibular advancements of ≥5 mm significantly increased the risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury, underscoring the need for enhanced preoperative counseling and surgical planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-01-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.101394
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neurosensory Disturbances and Recovery Patterns in Orthognathic Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis of 579 Cases From a Tertiary Referral Center

Takeshi Nomura, Takashi Kamio, Miki Watanabe, Masashi Iwamoto et al.
Cureus
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Neurosensory Disturbances and Recovery Patterns in Orthognathic Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis of 579 Cases From a Tertiary Referral Center

Takeshi Nomura, Takashi Kamio, Miki Watanabe, Masashi Iwamoto, Akira Katakura, Masae Yamamoto, Masahiro Okamura, Masato Narita
article en

Abstract

Background Le Fort I osteotomy and sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) are the most commonly performed procedures for correcting skeletal jaw deformities. Despite improved safety, neurosensory disturbances remain a significant postoperative complication. Comprehensive quantitative assessment of sensory recovery and identification of risk factors are essential for optimizing patient counseling and surgical planning. Methods A total of 579 cases with a complete six-month follow-up were analyzed from 642 consecutive orthognathic surgeries performed between 1 April 2020 and 31 March 2025 at the Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital. Neurosensory function was assessed using Semmes-Weinstein (SW) monofilament testing at one week and at one, two, three, and six months postoperatively. Normal sensation was defined as the detection of SW 1.65 monofilament, and severe hypoesthesia as failure to detect SW 4.56 or higher. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and multivariate logistic regression. Results Intraoperative complication rates were 0.4% in the Le Fort I group (n=225) and 2.5% in the SSRO group (n=354). Postoperatively, infraorbital nerve paresthesia occurred in 36/225 cases (16.0%), while inferior alveolar nerve paresthesia occurred in 139/354 left sides (39.3%) and 112/354 right sides (31.6%). Six-month neurosensory recovery rates were 94.4% in the Le Fort I group and 92.9% in the SSRO group, with >85% of recoveries occurring within the first three months. Mandibular advancement of ≥5 mm was the most significant independent risk factor for bilateral inferior alveolar nerve disturbance (left: <i>p</i>=0.000292; right: <i>p</i>=0.00196). Other complications included maxillary sinus mucosal thickening (14.2%) and metal plate fracture (1.1%). Conclusion Orthognathic surgery at this tertiary center demonstrated low intraoperative risk and excellent neurosensory recovery. However, mandibular advancements of ≥5 mm significantly increased the risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury, underscoring the need for enhanced preoperative counseling and surgical planning.

CureusVol. 18(1)
Nippon Dental University (JP), Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital (JP), Nippon Dental University Hospital (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.