Biocultural or Ecocultural?: A Conceptual Review and Recommendations for Interdisciplinary Research

This article critically examines the conceptual boundaries and applications of the terms biocultural and ecocultural in interdisciplinary research addressing biodiversity threats in rural communities. The aim is to clarify their meanings and propose recommendations for their use in sustainability science. We conducted an integrative conceptual review combining a narrative literature analysis and corpus linguistics methods on 54 documents across four disciplinary areas: Ecology and Biodiversity Conservation, Economics and Heritage, Ecocriticism and Literature, and Sociocultural Discourses. The narrative synthesis explores theoretical interpretations, while the corpus analysis quantifies term frequency and collocations to identify patterns of use. The results reveal that biocultural perspectives emphasise species-focused interactions, traditional knowledge, rights, ecoethics, and governance, whereas ecocultural approaches foreground discourse, communication, identity, education, and long-term ecological processes. Both frameworks converge in their concern for sustainability and cultural–ecological interdependence but differ in scope and temporal depth. This study contributes scientifically by offering a situated, interdisciplinary analysis of these concepts, and socially by underscoring the need for dialogical frameworks that respect local knowledge and expand applications beyond rural contexts to urban, educational, and policy domains. Recommendations are provided to guide interdisciplinary teams in adopting context-specific conceptualizations for research and action.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18020797
Primary Topic
Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biocultural or Ecocultural?: A Conceptual Review and Recommendations for Interdisciplinary Research

Sofía Rosa, Erasmo C. Macaya, Enrique A. Mundaca, Mariana Lazzaro-Salazar et al.
Sustainability
Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond
article

Biocultural or Ecocultural?: A Conceptual Review and Recommendations for Interdisciplinary Research

Sofía Rosa, Erasmo C. Macaya, Enrique A. Mundaca, Mariana Lazzaro-Salazar, Ángel Salazar, Diego Muñoz-Concha, Karina Carrasco-Jeldres, Ximena Quiñones-Díaz, Andrea Casals Hill
article en

Abstract

This article critically examines the conceptual boundaries and applications of the terms biocultural and ecocultural in interdisciplinary research addressing biodiversity threats in rural communities. The aim is to clarify their meanings and propose recommendations for their use in sustainability science. We conducted an integrative conceptual review combining a narrative literature analysis and corpus linguistics methods on 54 documents across four disciplinary areas: Ecology and Biodiversity Conservation, Economics and Heritage, Ecocriticism and Literature, and Sociocultural Discourses. The narrative synthesis explores theoretical interpretations, while the corpus analysis quantifies term frequency and collocations to identify patterns of use. The results reveal that biocultural perspectives emphasise species-focused interactions, traditional knowledge, rights, ecoethics, and governance, whereas ecocultural approaches foreground discourse, communication, identity, education, and long-term ecological processes. Both frameworks converge in their concern for sustainability and cultural–ecological interdependence but differ in scope and temporal depth. This study contributes scientifically by offering a situated, interdisciplinary analysis of these concepts, and socially by underscoring the need for dialogical frameworks that respect local knowledge and expand applications beyond rural contexts to urban, educational, and policy domains. Recommendations are provided to guide interdisciplinary teams in adopting context-specific conceptualizations for research and action.

SustainabilityVol. 18(2)
University of Concepción (CL), Catholic University of the Maule (CL), Finis Terrae University (CL), Millennium Institute of Oceanography (CL)
Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.