Performance across different versions of an artificial intelligence model for screen-reading of mammograms

Question Studies have reported promising results regarding the use of AI in mammography screening, but comparisons of updated versus older versions are less studied. Findings In our study, 87.1% (642/737) of the screen-detected cancers were classified with a high malignancy risk score by the old version, while it was 93.5% (689/737) for the newer version. Clinical relevance Understanding how version updates of AI models might impact screening mammography performance will be important for future quality assurance and validation of AI models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Radiology
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-12240-6
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance across different versions of an artificial intelligence model for screen-reading of mammograms

Jan F. Nygård, Heather A. Carlos, Solveig Roth Hoff, Håkon Lund-Hanssen et al.
European Radiology
AI in cancer detection
article

Performance across different versions of an artificial intelligence model for screen-reading of mammograms

Jan F. Nygård, Heather A. Carlos, Solveig Roth Hoff, Håkon Lund-Hanssen, A M Holen, Marie Burns Bergan, Steinar Auensen, Giske Ursin, Solveig Hofvind, Yan Chen, Marthe Larsen, Kristina Lång
article en

Abstract

Question Studies have reported promising results regarding the use of AI in mammography screening, but comparisons of updated versus older versions are less studied. Findings In our study, 87.1% (642/737) of the screen-detected cancers were classified with a high malignancy risk score by the old version, while it was 93.5% (689/737) for the newer version. Clinical relevance Understanding how version updates of AI models might impact screening mammography performance will be important for future quality assurance and validation of AI models.

European Radiology
University of Southern California (US), Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Nottingham (GB), University of Oslo (NO), Lund University (SE), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Nottingham City Hospital (GB), Ålesund Hospital (NO), St Olav's University Hospital (NO), Cancer Registry of Norway (NO), Skåne University Hospital (SE), UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Performance across different versions of an artificial intelligence model for screen-reading of mammograms — Jan F. Nygård, Heather A. Carlos, et al. · European Radiology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS