Machine Learning-Driven Optimization of Silicon Carbide Chemical Mechanical Polishing with Surface Roughness Constraints

Nanoscale surface finishing of silicon carbide (SiC) via chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) requires simultaneously achieving a high material removal rate (MRR) and subnanometer surface roughness (Ra), yet empirical tuning struggles to capture coupled tribochemical effects. Here, we develop an interpretable machine-learning (ML) framework trained on a designed set of 50 polishing experiments with a CeO<sub>2</sub> (cerium oxide)/H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (hydrogen peroxide) slurry to learn the multidimensional relationships between eight processing variables and CMP outcomes. We benchmark six baseline and two enhanced models and identify a five-member multilayer perceptron ensemble with polynomial feature expansion (5-MLP-PFE) as the top performer (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> ≈ 0.94 for MRR; 0.91 for Ra). Partial dependence, Shapley additive explanations (SHAP), and radial visualization (RadViz) analyses show that mechanical parameters (pressure, head speed, platen speed) principally control MRR, whereas slurry chemistry (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, CeO<sub>2</sub>, pH) sets the attainable Ra limit. The combined analyses delineate a practical high-MRR/low-Ra window─head speed 70-75 rpm, pressure 4.8-5.2 psi, H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> 4-5 vol %, CeO<sub>2</sub> 2-3 vol %, and pH 9.5-10.5─used to inverse-design process settings. Experimental validation of four ML-recommended formulations achieved Ra ≤ 0.13 nm with MRR up to 230.8 nm h<sup>-1</sup>, and complementary X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)/scanning electron microscope (SEM) characterization and finite-element modeling corroborated the predicted chemical and mechanical mechanisms. This reproducible, interpretable ML approach shortens formulation search and provides actionable process windows for SiC CMP, and the framework is transferable to other wide-bandgap semiconductor polishing processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Langmuir
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.5c05695
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
42.56
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning-Driven Optimization of Silicon Carbide Chemical Mechanical Polishing with Surface Roughness Constraints

Yuhang Qi, Zhen Qin, Jinghui Lai, Lei Zhao et al.
2 citations
Langmuir
Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
42.56
article

Machine Learning-Driven Optimization of Silicon Carbide Chemical Mechanical Polishing with Surface Roughness Constraints

Yuhang Qi, Zhen Qin, Jinghui Lai, Lei Zhao, Lihong Zhang, Lipu Han, Hujingyue Wang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Nanoscale surface finishing of silicon carbide (SiC) via chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) requires simultaneously achieving a high material removal rate (MRR) and subnanometer surface roughness (Ra), yet empirical tuning struggles to capture coupled tribochemical effects. Here, we develop an interpretable machine-learning (ML) framework trained on a designed set of 50 polishing experiments with a CeO<sub>2</sub> (cerium oxide)/H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (hydrogen peroxide) slurry to learn the multidimensional relationships between eight processing variables and CMP outcomes. We benchmark six baseline and two enhanced models and identify a five-member multilayer perceptron ensemble with polynomial feature expansion (5-MLP-PFE) as the top performer (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> ≈ 0.94 for MRR; 0.91 for Ra). Partial dependence, Shapley additive explanations (SHAP), and radial visualization (RadViz) analyses show that mechanical parameters (pressure, head speed, platen speed) principally control MRR, whereas slurry chemistry (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, CeO<sub>2</sub>, pH) sets the attainable Ra limit. The combined analyses delineate a practical high-MRR/low-Ra window─head speed 70-75 rpm, pressure 4.8-5.2 psi, H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> 4-5 vol %, CeO<sub>2</sub> 2-3 vol %, and pH 9.5-10.5─used to inverse-design process settings. Experimental validation of four ML-recommended formulations achieved Ra ≤ 0.13 nm with MRR up to 230.8 nm h<sup>-1</sup>, and complementary X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)/scanning electron microscope (SEM) characterization and finite-element modeling corroborated the predicted chemical and mechanical mechanisms. This reproducible, interpretable ML approach shortens formulation search and provides actionable process windows for SiC CMP, and the framework is transferable to other wide-bandgap semiconductor polishing processes.

LangmuirVol. 42(3)
University of Southern California (US), Hebei University of Technology (CN), Dalian University of Technology (CN), California Southern University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
42.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.