Operationalising evaluation of attainment raising interventions within widening participation: a case study evaluating a literacy intervention

This study investigates a reading support programme, offering key insights into the challenges of evaluating attainment-raising programmes within widening participation contexts in England. The research identifies three primary challenges: resource and infrastructure limitations, stakeholder engagement complexities, and data reliability, which present challenges to implementation and evaluation of such interventions. The findings highlight the limitations of rigid, standardised evaluation frameworks, arguing that these approaches often fail to capture the full impact of interventions targeting disadvantaged student populations. Instead, this study advocates for a phronetic approach that emphasises practitioner-based, context-sensitive knowledge. By integrating experiential insights from practitioners, the research presents an adaptive evaluation strategy that better reflects the realities of educational environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5456/wpll.27.3.118
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Operationalising evaluation of attainment raising interventions within widening participation: a case study evaluating a literacy intervention

Francesca Plom, Marta Almeida Hill
Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
article

Operationalising evaluation of attainment raising interventions within widening participation: a case study evaluating a literacy intervention

Francesca Plom, Marta Almeida Hill
article en

Abstract

This study investigates a reading support programme, offering key insights into the challenges of evaluating attainment-raising programmes within widening participation contexts in England. The research identifies three primary challenges: resource and infrastructure limitations, stakeholder engagement complexities, and data reliability, which present challenges to implementation and evaluation of such interventions. The findings highlight the limitations of rigid, standardised evaluation frameworks, arguing that these approaches often fail to capture the full impact of interventions targeting disadvantaged student populations. Instead, this study advocates for a phronetic approach that emphasises practitioner-based, context-sensitive knowledge. By integrating experiential insights from practitioners, the research presents an adaptive evaluation strategy that better reflects the realities of educational environments.

Widening Participation and Lifelong LearningVol. 27(3)
University of Kent (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.