Cognitive and emotional effects of bilateral prefrontal anodal tDCS and high-frequency tRNS in schizophrenia: a randomized sham-controlled study

Cognitive deficits in schizophrenia significantly hinder functional outcomes and often remain unresponsive to conventional treatments. While initial evidence suggested potential pro-cognitive effects of electrical brain stimulation in schizophrenia, recent meta-analyses have not supported these findings, warranting further investigation on intervention optimization. This sham-controlled crossover study explored cognitive and emotional effects of bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and high-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) in schizophrenia. Thirty-six male patients with schizophrenia participated in a crossover trial, receiving three sessions (tDCS, tRNS, sham) in counterbalanced order with 1-week intervals. tDCS and tRNS sessions involved 20-min 2 mA anodal stimulation and 2 mA 100-640 Hz random noise stimulation targeting the left and right DLPFCs (F3-F4) with two extracephalic return electrodes. Executive functions (working memory, spatial planning) were assessed during stimulation, and emotional changes were measured with the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) pre- and post-stimulation. Additionally, side effects and blinding efficacy were evaluated. Both bilateral DLPFC anodal tDCS and high-frequency tRNS significantly improved planning performance (mean problems solved, mean number of moves) compared to sham, with tRNS additionally enhancing working memory accuracy and strategy score. Both interventions increased positive affect and reduced negative affect after the intervention, with tRNS showing greater enhancement of positive emotions. Reduced negative affect after tRNS was correlated with improved executive planning. Side effects were minimal, and blinding was effective for the sham condition. Bilateral DLPFC anodal tDCS and high-frequency tRNS show promise as adjunctive treatments for schizophrenia, especially for cognitive deficits, with broader cognitive and emotional benefits observed with tRNS. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06155786 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06155786 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Schizophrenia
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-025-00720-z
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
61.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cognitive and emotional effects of bilateral prefrontal anodal tDCS and high-frequency tRNS in schizophrenia: a randomized sham-controlled study

Zahra Vaziri, Eisa Jafari, Kadosh Roi Cohen, Akbar Atadokht et al.
2 citations
Schizophrenia
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
61.27
article

Cognitive and emotional effects of bilateral prefrontal anodal tDCS and high-frequency tRNS in schizophrenia: a randomized sham-controlled study

Zahra Vaziri, Eisa Jafari, Kadosh Roi Cohen, Akbar Atadokht, Ali Moghadamzadeh, Mohammad Ali Salehinejad, Daniel M. Blumberger, Michael A. Nitsche, Ali Fathi Jouzdani
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Cognitive deficits in schizophrenia significantly hinder functional outcomes and often remain unresponsive to conventional treatments. While initial evidence suggested potential pro-cognitive effects of electrical brain stimulation in schizophrenia, recent meta-analyses have not supported these findings, warranting further investigation on intervention optimization. This sham-controlled crossover study explored cognitive and emotional effects of bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and high-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) in schizophrenia. Thirty-six male patients with schizophrenia participated in a crossover trial, receiving three sessions (tDCS, tRNS, sham) in counterbalanced order with 1-week intervals. tDCS and tRNS sessions involved 20-min 2 mA anodal stimulation and 2 mA 100-640 Hz random noise stimulation targeting the left and right DLPFCs (F3-F4) with two extracephalic return electrodes. Executive functions (working memory, spatial planning) were assessed during stimulation, and emotional changes were measured with the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) pre- and post-stimulation. Additionally, side effects and blinding efficacy were evaluated. Both bilateral DLPFC anodal tDCS and high-frequency tRNS significantly improved planning performance (mean problems solved, mean number of moves) compared to sham, with tRNS additionally enhancing working memory accuracy and strategy score. Both interventions increased positive affect and reduced negative affect after the intervention, with tRNS showing greater enhancement of positive emotions. Reduced negative affect after tRNS was correlated with improved executive planning. Side effects were minimal, and blinding was effective for the sham condition. Bilateral DLPFC anodal tDCS and high-frequency tRNS show promise as adjunctive treatments for schizophrenia, especially for cognitive deficits, with broader cognitive and emotional benefits observed with tRNS. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06155786 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06155786 .

SchizophreniaVol. 12(1)
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), University of Toronto (CA), TU Dortmund University (DE), Bielefeld University (DE), University of Tehran (IR), University of Surrey (GB), Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bielefeld (DE), Universitätsklinikum Aachen (DE), Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IR), Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (DE), Payame Noor University (IR), University of Mohaghegh Ardabili (IR), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
61.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.