Europe swings an axe at periodic reviews of pesticide ingredients

A proposal to scrap periodic reviews of pesticide active ingredients and allow them to remain on the European Union (EU) market indefinitely has outraged environmental groups and ecologists.The European Commission on Dec. 16 unveiled details of a proposal to “simplify” legislation related to food and feed safety. It says the package of measures, which includes the new plan for pesticide reviews along with other measures, could save over €1 billion ($1.2 billion) in annual compliance costs and speed up the transition to pesticides that are more environmentally friendly.As part of the package, the commission would remove requirements for the periodic reassessment of approved agricultural and antimicrobial pesticide ingredients from two EU regulations on plant protection products and biocidal products.Pesticide active ingredients are currently subject to a systematic review every 10–15 years. The commission says this eats up valuable administrative resources. As a consequence, the assessment of new active substances and first-time authorizations of innovative pesticide products consistently face delays of 5–10 years.The European Environmental Bureau (EEB), which represents over 180 organizations across Europe, calls the proposal “a slap in the face of science and citizens.” The group says mandatory reevaluations are a “cornerstone” of EU pesticide law and the “primary mechanism for identifying emerging risks.”Contrastingly, the European Crop Care Association (ECCA) says more targeted reassessments will make the laws run more efficiently. The proposal “brings our industry closer to strengthening the competitiveness of European agriculture, while maintaining scientific scrutiny to protect health and the environment,” ECCA general manager, Paolo Marchesini,

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
C&EN Global Enterprise
Published
2026-01-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/cen-10401-polcon1
Primary Topic
Agricultural safety and regulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Europe swings an axe at periodic reviews of pesticide ingredients

special to C EN Vanessa Zainzinger
C&EN Global Enterprise
Agricultural safety and regulations
article

Europe swings an axe at periodic reviews of pesticide ingredients

special to C EN Vanessa Zainzinger
article en

Abstract

A proposal to scrap periodic reviews of pesticide active ingredients and allow them to remain on the European Union (EU) market indefinitely has outraged environmental groups and ecologists.The European Commission on Dec. 16 unveiled details of a proposal to “simplify” legislation related to food and feed safety. It says the package of measures, which includes the new plan for pesticide reviews along with other measures, could save over €1 billion ($1.2 billion) in annual compliance costs and speed up the transition to pesticides that are more environmentally friendly.As part of the package, the commission would remove requirements for the periodic reassessment of approved agricultural and antimicrobial pesticide ingredients from two EU regulations on plant protection products and biocidal products.Pesticide active ingredients are currently subject to a systematic review every 10–15 years. The commission says this eats up valuable administrative resources. As a consequence, the assessment of new active substances and first-time authorizations of innovative pesticide products consistently face delays of 5–10 years.The European Environmental Bureau (EEB), which represents over 180 organizations across Europe, calls the proposal “a slap in the face of science and citizens.” The group says mandatory reevaluations are a “cornerstone” of EU pesticide law and the “primary mechanism for identifying emerging risks.”Contrastingly, the European Crop Care Association (ECCA) says more targeted reassessments will make the laws run more efficiently. The proposal “brings our industry closer to strengthening the competitiveness of European agriculture, while maintaining scientific scrutiny to protect health and the environment,” ECCA general manager, Paolo Marchesini,

C&EN Global EnterpriseVol. 104(1)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Agricultural safety and regulations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.