Disentangling the impacts of collective mobility of residents and non-residents on burglary levels

This study investigates how the collective mobility (including movement and visiting) of residents and non-residents affects neighbourhood burglary levels. While past research has linked mobility to urban crime, this study explores how these relationships vary across population groups and social contexts at the neighbourhood level. Using mobile phone GPS data, we distinguished between residents and non-residents based on daily movement patterns. We then measured their mobility within defined spatial and temporal units. An explainable machine learning method (XGBoost and SHAP) was used to assess how mobility patterns influence burglary in London's LSOAs from 2020 to 2021. Results show that increased collective mobility is generally associated with higher burglary levels. Specifically, non-resident footfall and residents' stay-at-home time have a stronger influence than other variables like residents' travelled distance. The impact also varies across neighbourhoods and shifts during periods of COVID-19 restrictions and relaxations. These findings confirm the dynamic link between mobility and crime, highlighting the value of understanding population-specific patterns to inform more targeted policing strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computational Urban Science
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43762-025-00234-5
Primary Topic
Crime Patterns and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disentangling the impacts of collective mobility of residents and non-residents on burglary levels

Tongxin Chen, Tao Cheng, Kate Bowers
Computational Urban Science
Crime Patterns and Interventions
article

Disentangling the impacts of collective mobility of residents and non-residents on burglary levels

Tongxin Chen, Tao Cheng, Kate Bowers
article en

Abstract

This study investigates how the collective mobility (including movement and visiting) of residents and non-residents affects neighbourhood burglary levels. While past research has linked mobility to urban crime, this study explores how these relationships vary across population groups and social contexts at the neighbourhood level. Using mobile phone GPS data, we distinguished between residents and non-residents based on daily movement patterns. We then measured their mobility within defined spatial and temporal units. An explainable machine learning method (XGBoost and SHAP) was used to assess how mobility patterns influence burglary in London's LSOAs from 2020 to 2021. Results show that increased collective mobility is generally associated with higher burglary levels. Specifically, non-resident footfall and residents' stay-at-home time have a stronger influence than other variables like residents' travelled distance. The impact also varies across neighbourhoods and shifts during periods of COVID-19 restrictions and relaxations. These findings confirm the dynamic link between mobility and crime, highlighting the value of understanding population-specific patterns to inform more targeted policing strategies.

Computational Urban ScienceVol. 6(1)
The Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Hull (GB), University College London (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Crime Patterns and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Disentangling the impacts of collective mobility of residents and non-residents on burglary levels — Tongxin Chen, Tao Cheng, et al. · Computational Urban Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS