Owner Risk Crisis Communication: Revisiting the Korean Air ‘Nut Rage’ Apology

This case study examines the Korean Air “Nut Rage” incident as a high-profile example of “owner risk” within South Korea’s chaebol system, where inherited family control can lead to public crises. It analyzes Korean Air’s crisis communication strategy, focusing on CEO Cho’s emotion-centered apology on behalf of his daughter, and situates this within Korean cultural expectations around familial responsibility. The case explores how protecting the company’s owner over stakeholders intensified public backlash, especially in an era of social media where traditional media control is ineffective. It also assesses the financial consequences through an event study and investigates the effectiveness of different apology types in restoring public trust. This case is appropriate for graduate or advanced undergraduate courses in Crisis Communication, Business Ethics, Corporate Governance, and Asian Business, offering students insights into crisis leadership, corporate accountability, and stakeholder management in family-led firms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Communication Quarterly
Published
2026-01-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189251415166
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Owner Risk Crisis Communication: Revisiting the Korean Air ‘Nut Rage’ Apology

Yunna Rhee, Hyun Joung Jin, Jae Hyun Park
Management Communication Quarterly
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
article

Owner Risk Crisis Communication: Revisiting the Korean Air ‘Nut Rage’ Apology

Yunna Rhee, Hyun Joung Jin, Jae Hyun Park
article en

Abstract

This case study examines the Korean Air “Nut Rage” incident as a high-profile example of “owner risk” within South Korea’s chaebol system, where inherited family control can lead to public crises. It analyzes Korean Air’s crisis communication strategy, focusing on CEO Cho’s emotion-centered apology on behalf of his daughter, and situates this within Korean cultural expectations around familial responsibility. The case explores how protecting the company’s owner over stakeholders intensified public backlash, especially in an era of social media where traditional media control is ineffective. It also assesses the financial consequences through an event study and investigates the effectiveness of different apology types in restoring public trust. This case is appropriate for graduate or advanced undergraduate courses in Crisis Communication, Business Ethics, Corporate Governance, and Asian Business, offering students insights into crisis leadership, corporate accountability, and stakeholder management in family-led firms.

Management Communication Quarterly
Chung-Ang University (KR), Hankuk University of Foreign Studies (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.