Subphenotype–Specific Risk of Intracranial Hemorrhage During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

This study compared the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) among three previously identified acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) subphenotypes: fibrotic, dry, and wet. This retrospective, multicenter observational study used a Japanese database of adult patients with severe ARDS supported with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO). The Fine-Gray competing risk models were applied with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to evaluate the impact of ARDS subphenotypes on ICH incidence. Of 536 patients included in the analysis, 185 (34.5%) were classified as fibrotic, 185 (34.5%) as dry, and 166 (31.0%) as wet. Intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 3.7% (20/536) of patients during VV ECMO support and was associated with significantly higher mortality compared with patients without ICH (65.0% [13/20] vs. 27.5% [142/516]; p < 0.001). Intracranial hemorrhage incidence was 8.7% (16/185), 0.5% (1/185), and 1.8% (3/166) in the fibrotic, dry, and wet groups, respectively, with a significantly higher incidence in the fibrotic group (p < 0.001). The fibrotic type was independently associated with a higher ICH risk compared with the other two types (hazard ratio: 4.33, 95% confidence interval: 1.47-12.69; p = 0.015). Severe ARDS cases classified as fibrotic had a significantly higher ICH risk during VV ECMO, highlighting the need for increased vigilance in this subgroup.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ASAIO Journal
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/mat.0000000000002629
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Subphenotype–Specific Risk of Intracranial Hemorrhage During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Ryo Emoto, Shigeyuki Matsui, Wataru Fukumoto, Nobuaki Shime et al.
ASAIO Journal
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Subphenotype–Specific Risk of Intracranial Hemorrhage During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Ryo Emoto, Shigeyuki Matsui, Wataru Fukumoto, Nobuaki Shime, Kazuo Awai, Shinichiro Ohshimo, J-CARVE registry group, Mitsuaki Nishikimi
article en

Abstract

This study compared the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) among three previously identified acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) subphenotypes: fibrotic, dry, and wet. This retrospective, multicenter observational study used a Japanese database of adult patients with severe ARDS supported with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO). The Fine-Gray competing risk models were applied with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to evaluate the impact of ARDS subphenotypes on ICH incidence. Of 536 patients included in the analysis, 185 (34.5%) were classified as fibrotic, 185 (34.5%) as dry, and 166 (31.0%) as wet. Intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 3.7% (20/536) of patients during VV ECMO support and was associated with significantly higher mortality compared with patients without ICH (65.0% [13/20] vs. 27.5% [142/516]; p < 0.001). Intracranial hemorrhage incidence was 8.7% (16/185), 0.5% (1/185), and 1.8% (3/166) in the fibrotic, dry, and wet groups, respectively, with a significantly higher incidence in the fibrotic group (p < 0.001). The fibrotic type was independently associated with a higher ICH risk compared with the other two types (hazard ratio: 4.33, 95% confidence interval: 1.47-12.69; p = 0.015). Severe ARDS cases classified as fibrotic had a significantly higher ICH risk during VV ECMO, highlighting the need for increased vigilance in this subgroup.

ASAIO Journal
Hiroshima University (JP), Apple (Israel) (IL), Aichi Medical University (JP), Kyoto University (JP), Novem (Netherlands) (NL), The Stables (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.