Rethinking “technical” competence: beyond binary classifications in surgical education and practice
Abstract In this commentary we make a call to action to rethink “technical” competence. This commentary was invited in response to an article published by Cloonan et al. (2025) who report on patterns of feedback for surgical residents using a binary classification of data classified as “technical” and “non-technical”. While we welcome detailed analysis of skills, we argue that these categorisations oversimplify surgical practice and do not reflect the complex sets of skills required for safe surgical practice.
Authors
- Debra Nestel
- Ian Incoll
Institutions
- Austin Hospital (AU)
- Monash University (AU)
- University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Global Surgical Education - Journal of the Association for Surgical Education
- Published
- 2026-01-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s44186-025-00455-6
- Primary Topic
- Surgical Simulation and Training
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00