Multicancer Detection Assays: Promise and Potential Harms of a Novel Cancer Screening Tool

Multicancer detection (MCD) tests are an emerging innovation in cancer screening that use blood samples to detect multiple cancer types at once, potentially identifying malignancies earlier and with greater accessibility than traditional, site-specific screening methods. Several tests have demonstrated the ability to detect cancer signals and suggest tissue of origin, which may enhance screening for cancers with existing screening tests and fill critical gaps for cancers lacking effective screening modalities. However, MCD testing raises concerns about the potential for substantial harm, including false-positive test results leading to short-term emotional distress and wasteful and potentially risky testing, unwarranted reassurance when results are falsely negative, the identification of indolent cancers (overdiagnosis), and increased strain on health care resources. Unclear follow-up protocols and limited harms reporting further complicate their use. Equity issues persist, as clinical trials may lack diverse representation and potentially miss population-specific risks. To ensure that MCD tests provide a net benefit to patients and to minimize the burden on health systems, rigorous evaluation, transparent harms reporting, and the implementation of robust practices for follow-up and shared decision-making are essential. As these tests evolve and their use becomes more widespread, careful integration into existing screening practices will be key to maximizing benefit while minimizing unintended consequences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Permanente Journal
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7812/tpp/25.075
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multicancer Detection Assays: Promise and Potential Harms of a Novel Cancer Screening Tool

Quyen Ngo‐Metzger, Dominick Zheng, Michael K Gould, Caroline M Snead
The Permanente Journal
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Multicancer Detection Assays: Promise and Potential Harms of a Novel Cancer Screening Tool

Quyen Ngo‐Metzger, Dominick Zheng, Michael K Gould, Caroline M Snead
article en

Abstract

Multicancer detection (MCD) tests are an emerging innovation in cancer screening that use blood samples to detect multiple cancer types at once, potentially identifying malignancies earlier and with greater accessibility than traditional, site-specific screening methods. Several tests have demonstrated the ability to detect cancer signals and suggest tissue of origin, which may enhance screening for cancers with existing screening tests and fill critical gaps for cancers lacking effective screening modalities. However, MCD testing raises concerns about the potential for substantial harm, including false-positive test results leading to short-term emotional distress and wasteful and potentially risky testing, unwarranted reassurance when results are falsely negative, the identification of indolent cancers (overdiagnosis), and increased strain on health care resources. Unclear follow-up protocols and limited harms reporting further complicate their use. Equity issues persist, as clinical trials may lack diverse representation and potentially miss population-specific risks. To ensure that MCD tests provide a net benefit to patients and to minimize the burden on health systems, rigorous evaluation, transparent harms reporting, and the implementation of robust practices for follow-up and shared decision-making are essential. As these tests evolve and their use becomes more widespread, careful integration into existing screening practices will be key to maximizing benefit while minimizing unintended consequences.

The Permanente JournalVol. 30(1)
Kaiser Permanente (US), UCLA Medical Center (US), Harbor–UCLA Medical Center (US), University of California, Davis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.