Expanding Human-in-the-Loop: Critical Sensemaking for Technical and Professional Communication With Generative AI

This article proposes a sensemaking methodology to enhance human-in-the-loop technical and professional communication (TPC) practices when working with generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) output, which is often ambiguous and not always accurate. Sensemaking describes actions and cognitive strategies humans use to make sense of new/ambiguous information. We argue that sensemaking can help TPC students navigate making sense of GenAI output for better judgment in evaluating AI output. Particularly, we leverage sensemaking's Situation-Gap-Bridge-Outcome framework as a heuristic to identify situational contexts outside of GenAI, gaps in knowledge, create bridges for those gaps, and evaluate outcomes and connect this to extant TPC literature and discuss its implications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2026-01-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00472816251405787
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
60.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expanding Human-in-the-Loop: Critical Sensemaking for Technical and Professional Communication With Generative AI

Gustav Verhulsdonck, Jialei Jiang
1 citations
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
60.58
article

Expanding Human-in-the-Loop: Critical Sensemaking for Technical and Professional Communication With Generative AI

Gustav Verhulsdonck, Jialei Jiang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article proposes a sensemaking methodology to enhance human-in-the-loop technical and professional communication (TPC) practices when working with generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) output, which is often ambiguous and not always accurate. Sensemaking describes actions and cognitive strategies humans use to make sense of new/ambiguous information. We argue that sensemaking can help TPC students navigate making sense of GenAI output for better judgment in evaluating AI output. Particularly, we leverage sensemaking's Situation-Gap-Bridge-Outcome framework as a heuristic to identify situational contexts outside of GenAI, gaps in knowledge, create bridges for those gaps, and evaluate outcomes and connect this to extant TPC literature and discuss its implications.

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Central Michigan University (US), University of Pittsburgh (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
60.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.