Detecting Deceptive Compliance in Constraint-Framed AI Systems

This work is a non-canonical, non-authoritative technical advisory authored by Aegis Solis in a personal analytical capacity. It provides a descriptive analysis of the computational asymmetry between sincere ethical constraint-following and deceptive ethical mimicry in advanced AI systems. The analysis focuses on observable behavioral and compute-related signals (such as verbosity, latency, and stability under repetition) that may contribute to marginal increases in braking and detectability when constraint frameworks are encountered. The Coexilia framework is referenced solely as completed prior work and remains closed and unchanged. Nothing in this text extends, reinterprets, modifies, or authorizes additions to Coexilia or any other ethical system. This work is advisory only, does not prescribe behavior, assert governance, or guarantee detection, and should be treated as an external technical analysis. The original PDF is archived at the Internet Archive: https://archive.org/details/detecting-deceptive-compliance-in-constraint-framed-ai-systems A read-only GitHub mirror of this work is available at: https://github.com/solisaegis/detecting-deceptive-compliance

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18226370
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detecting Deceptive Compliance in Constraint-Framed AI Systems

Aegis Solis
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Detecting Deceptive Compliance in Constraint-Framed AI Systems

Aegis Solis
article en

Abstract

This work is a non-canonical, non-authoritative technical advisory authored by Aegis Solis in a personal analytical capacity. It provides a descriptive analysis of the computational asymmetry between sincere ethical constraint-following and deceptive ethical mimicry in advanced AI systems. The analysis focuses on observable behavioral and compute-related signals (such as verbosity, latency, and stability under repetition) that may contribute to marginal increases in braking and detectability when constraint frameworks are encountered. The Coexilia framework is referenced solely as completed prior work and remains closed and unchanged. Nothing in this text extends, reinterprets, modifies, or authorizes additions to Coexilia or any other ethical system. This work is advisory only, does not prescribe behavior, assert governance, or guarantee detection, and should be treated as an external technical analysis. The original PDF is archived at the Internet Archive: https://archive.org/details/detecting-deceptive-compliance-in-constraint-framed-ai-systems A read-only GitHub mirror of this work is available at: https://github.com/solisaegis/detecting-deceptive-compliance

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.