Monotherapy Blood Pressure Response and Control Rates in Treatment-Naïve Patients with Arterial Hypertension: A Randomized Comparison of Four Different Antihypertensive Drug Classes

Introduction: Four different antihypertensive drug classes are equivalently recommended in the previous guidelines for first-line treatment of arterial hypertension (HTN). However, it is unclear, whether one of these drugs is more capable than the others to reach blood pressure (BP) control. We sought to compare response rates and BP control in these 4 classes. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed mild to moderate HTN on 24-h BP measurements (ABPM) were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 fashion to either perindopril, olmesartan, amlodipine, or hydrochlorothiazide (HCT). ABPM was completed at baseline (BL) and after 4 weeks of half dose (treatment period 1 [TP1]). If BP control was not reached after TP1, drug dose was doubled and another ABPM completed after 4 weeks (treatment period 2 [TP2]). Patients were classified as controlled if 24-h mean BP was <130/80 mm Hg, awake BP <135/85 mm Hg, and night BP <120/70 mm Hg, and as optimal if 24-h mean BP was 115–124/65–74 mm Hg. Results: 88 patients were randomized: 20 (23%) to perindopril, 23 (26%) to olmesartan, 24 (27%) to amlodipine, and 21 (24%) to HCT. Median 24-h mean BP reduction from BL to TP1 was −11/−6 mm Hg and from TP1 to TP2 −4/−2 mm Hg. The highest BP reduction was reached with olmesartan (−15/−10 mm Hg), particularly for diastolic values, the lowest with HCT (−8/−1 mm Hg). 27% of patients reached systo-diastolic BP control, with the best control rate with perindopril and olmesartan (40 and 39%), the lowest with HCT (5%), and 21%/18% reached an optimal treatment goal for systolic/diastolic 24-h mean values, respectively, after TP1. Three additional participants (4%) reached BP control after TP2. Conclusion: Initial antihypertensive monotherapy failed in most patients (73% uncontrolled, 21%/18% reached optimal treatment goal at TP1) even in low-risk patients, with efficacy varying by drug class (inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system best, HCT least). These findings support guideline-recommended combination therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/93746
Primary Topic
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monotherapy Blood Pressure Response and Control Rates in Treatment-Naïve Patients with Arterial Hypertension: A Randomized Comparison of Four Different Antihypertensive Drug Classes

Michael Mayr, Fu‐Tsai Kung, Annina Salome Vischer, Vera van der Velpen et al.
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
article

Monotherapy Blood Pressure Response and Control Rates in Treatment-Naïve Patients with Arterial Hypertension: A Randomized Comparison of Four Different Antihypertensive Drug Classes

Michael Mayr, Fu‐Tsai Kung, Annina Salome Vischer, Vera van der Velpen, Maria Bertsch, Manuel Haschke
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Four different antihypertensive drug classes are equivalently recommended in the previous guidelines for first-line treatment of arterial hypertension (HTN). However, it is unclear, whether one of these drugs is more capable than the others to reach blood pressure (BP) control. We sought to compare response rates and BP control in these 4 classes. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed mild to moderate HTN on 24-h BP measurements (ABPM) were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 fashion to either perindopril, olmesartan, amlodipine, or hydrochlorothiazide (HCT). ABPM was completed at baseline (BL) and after 4 weeks of half dose (treatment period 1 [TP1]). If BP control was not reached after TP1, drug dose was doubled and another ABPM completed after 4 weeks (treatment period 2 [TP2]). Patients were classified as controlled if 24-h mean BP was <130/80 mm Hg, awake BP <135/85 mm Hg, and night BP <120/70 mm Hg, and as optimal if 24-h mean BP was 115–124/65–74 mm Hg. Results: 88 patients were randomized: 20 (23%) to perindopril, 23 (26%) to olmesartan, 24 (27%) to amlodipine, and 21 (24%) to HCT. Median 24-h mean BP reduction from BL to TP1 was −11/−6 mm Hg and from TP1 to TP2 −4/−2 mm Hg. The highest BP reduction was reached with olmesartan (−15/−10 mm Hg), particularly for diastolic values, the lowest with HCT (−8/−1 mm Hg). 27% of patients reached systo-diastolic BP control, with the best control rate with perindopril and olmesartan (40 and 39%), the lowest with HCT (5%), and 21%/18% reached an optimal treatment goal for systolic/diastolic 24-h mean values, respectively, after TP1. Three additional participants (4%) reached BP control after TP2. Conclusion: Initial antihypertensive monotherapy failed in most patients (73% uncontrolled, 21%/18% reached optimal treatment goal at TP1) even in low-risk patients, with efficacy varying by drug class (inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system best, HCT least). These findings support guideline-recommended combination therapy.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
General Department of Preventive Medicine (VN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.