Entropy as an Epistemic Artifact Under Deterministic Causation

Abstract This paper clarifies the ontological status of entropy under a single explicit axiom: deterministic evolution on full physical state. Under this assumption, probability cannot be fundamental and must be epistemic, reflecting incomplete knowledge rather than physical indeterminacy. Because all standard formulations of entropy—Shannon, Boltzmann, and Gibbs—presuppose probability distributions or coarse-grained state descriptions, entropy cannot be ontological once full-state causation is fixed. The paper reclassifies the Second Law of Thermodynamics as an inference law over macrostates rather than a fundamental law of motion, without disputing its empirical validity or practical indispensability. Structural consequences are derived for physics, information theory, and artificial intelligence, including the result that stochasticity is not required for exploration, creativity, or intelligence. Deterministic systems can generate novelty through structured traversal of state space under constraint. The contribution is not a new physical theory but a necessary clarification. It establishes that entropy, while real and measurable, is an epistemic artifact under deterministic causation and therefore cannot serve as a foundational ontological primitive.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18217372
Primary Topic
Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Entropy as an Epistemic Artifact Under Deterministic Causation

Devin Bostick
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
article

Entropy as an Epistemic Artifact Under Deterministic Causation

Devin Bostick
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper clarifies the ontological status of entropy under a single explicit axiom: deterministic evolution on full physical state. Under this assumption, probability cannot be fundamental and must be epistemic, reflecting incomplete knowledge rather than physical indeterminacy. Because all standard formulations of entropy—Shannon, Boltzmann, and Gibbs—presuppose probability distributions or coarse-grained state descriptions, entropy cannot be ontological once full-state causation is fixed. The paper reclassifies the Second Law of Thermodynamics as an inference law over macrostates rather than a fundamental law of motion, without disputing its empirical validity or practical indispensability. Structural consequences are derived for physics, information theory, and artificial intelligence, including the result that stochasticity is not required for exploration, creativity, or intelligence. Deterministic systems can generate novelty through structured traversal of state space under constraint. The contribution is not a new physical theory but a necessary clarification. It establishes that entropy, while real and measurable, is an epistemic artifact under deterministic causation and therefore cannot serve as a foundational ontological primitive.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.