European cybersecurity challenges and policy gaps. The Estonian experience in cybersecurity

Following the COVID-19 pandemic, the European Union hasstrengthened its cybersecurity policies to address the growing threats generated byincreased digital dependence, including attacks on critical infrastructures,individuals, and businesses. While notable progress has been made, fragmentationremains a major challenge. Legal and regulatory advancements, such as the NIS2Directive, the Cyber Resilience Act, and DORA, have harmonized standards andreduced disparities among Member States. Horizontal fragmentation between EUinstitutions and agencies has improved through strengthened ENISA competencesand cooperation mechanisms like CERT-EU, the CSIRTs network, and CyCLONe,yet overlapping mandates and the absence of a central coordinating authority persist.Vertical fragmentation, involving the EU, Member States, and the private sector,remains pronounced, as sovereign prerogatives and limited information-sharinghinder coherence. This study evaluates the EU’s post-pandemic cybersecurityframework, identifies structural and institutional challenges, and draws lessons fromEstonia’s cybersecurity model using qualitative analysis of EU strategies, ENISAand Europol reports, and academic literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EURINT
Published
2025-12-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47743/eurint-2025-foc
Primary Topic
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

European cybersecurity challenges and policy gaps. The Estonian experience in cybersecurity

Andreea Cosmina Foca
EURINT
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
article

European cybersecurity challenges and policy gaps. The Estonian experience in cybersecurity

Andreea Cosmina Foca
article en

Abstract

Following the COVID-19 pandemic, the European Union hasstrengthened its cybersecurity policies to address the growing threats generated byincreased digital dependence, including attacks on critical infrastructures,individuals, and businesses. While notable progress has been made, fragmentationremains a major challenge. Legal and regulatory advancements, such as the NIS2Directive, the Cyber Resilience Act, and DORA, have harmonized standards andreduced disparities among Member States. Horizontal fragmentation between EUinstitutions and agencies has improved through strengthened ENISA competencesand cooperation mechanisms like CERT-EU, the CSIRTs network, and CyCLONe,yet overlapping mandates and the absence of a central coordinating authority persist.Vertical fragmentation, involving the EU, Member States, and the private sector,remains pronounced, as sovereign prerogatives and limited information-sharinghinder coherence. This study evaluates the EU’s post-pandemic cybersecurityframework, identifies structural and institutional challenges, and draws lessons fromEstonia’s cybersecurity model using qualitative analysis of EU strategies, ENISAand Europol reports, and academic literature.

EURINTVol. 12
Alexandru Ioan Cuza University (RO)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

European cybersecurity challenges and policy gaps. The Estonian experience in cybersecurity — Andreea Cosmina Foca · EURINT (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS