Fracture resistance of translucent zirconia overlay restoration with different preparation designs

This in-vitro study was planned to evaluate the fracture load of translucent zirconia overlay restoration made with different tooth preparation designs. Thirty-two sound mandibular molars were divided into four main groups (n = 8), based on different overlay preparation designs. Group 1 anatomic cusps with chamfer finish line (ACC), group 2: flat cusp with chamfer finish line (FCC), group 3: anatomic cusp reduction with proximal steps (ACS), group 4: flat cups reduction with proximal steps (FCS). The teeth were restored using translucent monolithic zirconia (IPS e.max ZirCAD, Ivoclar, FL). Cementation was performed using adhesive resin cement. Specimens were stored in water at 37 °C for 45 days then followed by cyclic loading fatigue for 120,000 cycles. Finally, specimens were fractured under compressive load in Newton (N) using a universal testing machine. A stereo microscope and scanning electron microscope (SEM) were used to examine and categorize the failure pattern modes. Two and one-way ANOVAs and Post hoc Tukey tests were used for statistical analyses. Group ACC demonstrated the highest fracture resistance (4371 ± 440), followed by ACS group (3995 ± 274) and FCC group (3954 ± 698), FCS group showed the lowest fracture load (3483 ± 567). Both cusp design and margin design affected fracture resistance. Anatomical cusp with chamfer finish line showed the highest fracture resistance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-01-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-07456-3
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fracture resistance of translucent zirconia overlay restoration with different preparation designs

Lamia Dawood, Mohamed W. Elanwar, Ahmed Attia, Yousra Ahmed Awad
BMC Oral Health
Dental materials and restorations
article

Fracture resistance of translucent zirconia overlay restoration with different preparation designs

Lamia Dawood, Mohamed W. Elanwar, Ahmed Attia, Yousra Ahmed Awad
article en

Abstract

This in-vitro study was planned to evaluate the fracture load of translucent zirconia overlay restoration made with different tooth preparation designs. Thirty-two sound mandibular molars were divided into four main groups (n = 8), based on different overlay preparation designs. Group 1 anatomic cusps with chamfer finish line (ACC), group 2: flat cusp with chamfer finish line (FCC), group 3: anatomic cusp reduction with proximal steps (ACS), group 4: flat cups reduction with proximal steps (FCS). The teeth were restored using translucent monolithic zirconia (IPS e.max ZirCAD, Ivoclar, FL). Cementation was performed using adhesive resin cement. Specimens were stored in water at 37 °C for 45 days then followed by cyclic loading fatigue for 120,000 cycles. Finally, specimens were fractured under compressive load in Newton (N) using a universal testing machine. A stereo microscope and scanning electron microscope (SEM) were used to examine and categorize the failure pattern modes. Two and one-way ANOVAs and Post hoc Tukey tests were used for statistical analyses. Group ACC demonstrated the highest fracture resistance (4371 ± 440), followed by ACS group (3995 ± 274) and FCC group (3954 ± 698), FCS group showed the lowest fracture load (3483 ± 567). Both cusp design and margin design affected fracture resistance. Anatomical cusp with chamfer finish line showed the highest fracture resistance.

BMC Oral HealthVol. 26(1)
Mansoura University (EG), National Research Centre (EG)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.