Convergences and Gaps between Environmental Ethics, Climate Ethics, and Research Ethics: A Scoping Review

Technological innovation is a double-edged sword for the environment. While it can significantly reduce environmental and societal risks of harm, technological progress is often a major contributor to environmental degradation. This suggests the need for an anticipatory approach to research oversight which can mitigate the harmful and contradictory effects of research and innovation. In this article, we conduct a scoping review to identify cross-cutting concepts between environmental ethics, environmental justice, climate ethics, climate justice, and research ethics and integrity, focusing on literature on research and technological innovation. This article identifies an important gap between research ethics and these other topic areas. It also demonstrates the importance of updating existing research ethics frameworks to incorporate environmental concerns evident in environmental ethics and climate justice. Finally, it reveals an over-representation of studies focused upon climate change at the expense of other environmental issues, and of research on the ethics and governance of geoengineering, which we suggest is not a generalisable model for governance of research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science and Engineering Ethics
Published
2026-01-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-025-00575-8
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Geoengineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Convergences and Gaps between Environmental Ethics, Climate Ethics, and Research Ethics: A Scoping Review

Rachel Fishberg, Jan Mehlich, Anaïs Rességuier, Michel Bourban et al.
Science and Engineering Ethics
Climate Change and Geoengineering
article

Convergences and Gaps between Environmental Ethics, Climate Ethics, and Research Ethics: A Scoping Review

Rachel Fishberg, Jan Mehlich, Anaïs Rességuier, Michel Bourban, Rose Heffernan, Mads P. Sørensen, Kasandra I. H. M. Poague, Rosie Hastings, Alexandra Csábi, Fabian Fischbach, José Luis Molina, Dominic Lenzi
article en

Abstract

Technological innovation is a double-edged sword for the environment. While it can significantly reduce environmental and societal risks of harm, technological progress is often a major contributor to environmental degradation. This suggests the need for an anticipatory approach to research oversight which can mitigate the harmful and contradictory effects of research and innovation. In this article, we conduct a scoping review to identify cross-cutting concepts between environmental ethics, environmental justice, climate ethics, climate justice, and research ethics and integrity, focusing on literature on research and technological innovation. This article identifies an important gap between research ethics and these other topic areas. It also demonstrates the importance of updating existing research ethics frameworks to incorporate environmental concerns evident in environmental ethics and climate justice. Finally, it reveals an over-representation of studies focused upon climate change at the expense of other environmental issues, and of research on the ethics and governance of geoengineering, which we suggest is not a generalisable model for governance of research.

Science and Engineering EthicsVol. 32(1)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH (AT), University of Bonn (DE), Aarhus University (DK), Cal Humanities (US), Trilateral Research & Consulting (GB), Engage (Germany) (DE), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Life & Brain (Germany) (DE), University of Twente (NL)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Climate Change and Geoengineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.