Optimizing inventory management in the automotive industry: A comparative study of crisp and fuzzy systems

<ns3:p>Background Inventory management is essential to ensure cost efficiency and operational continuity in the automotive sector. Traditional (crisp) inventory systems assume fixed values for the input parameters, which may not reflect real-world variability. This study compares the performance of crisp and fuzzy inventory models in managing uncertainty in demand and costs, using Tesla as a case context. Methods Inventory models were developed under crisp and fuzzy frameworks, incorporating a quadratic time-dependent demand function, holding costs, deterioration, production, and setup costs. In the fuzzy model, the key parameters were represented using trapezoidal fuzzy numbers, and the centroid method was applied for defuzzification. Mathematica 14.0, was used to compute the optimal cycle time and total cost for both systems. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the impact of variations in each parameter. Results The fuzzy inventory model produced a lower total cost ($57.06) compared to the crisp model ($143.33), reflecting an 86.11% reduction. The fuzzy system also demonstrated improved robustness to changes in production rate, setup cost, and deterioration rate. Both models produced similar economic order quantities, but were more economical and flexible to parameter variations. Sensitivity analysis proved that the system was more sensitive to minor changes in input values for the crisp model, raising the overall cost higher than that of the fuzzy model. Conclusions Fuzzy inventory systems can address demand uncertainty and cost variability in the automotive industry. It can be noted that applying inventory planning within fuzzy logic can save costs and aid in reacting better to fluctuations in the market. Such applications can be applied to companies considering the high demand and production variability. Subsequent studies can further develop multi-item models and combine stochastic lead times or dynamic prices.</ns3:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
F1000Research
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.170276.1
Primary Topic
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing inventory management in the automotive industry: A comparative study of crisp and fuzzy systems

Shahid Husain, Amar Johri, Ashfaque Ahmed, Anu Sayal et al.
F1000Research
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
article

Optimizing inventory management in the automotive industry: A comparative study of crisp and fuzzy systems

Shahid Husain, Amar Johri, Ashfaque Ahmed, Anu Sayal, Vasim Ahmad, Seema Khurshid Qureshi, Lai Yee Tong
article en

Abstract

<ns3:p>Background Inventory management is essential to ensure cost efficiency and operational continuity in the automotive sector. Traditional (crisp) inventory systems assume fixed values for the input parameters, which may not reflect real-world variability. This study compares the performance of crisp and fuzzy inventory models in managing uncertainty in demand and costs, using Tesla as a case context. Methods Inventory models were developed under crisp and fuzzy frameworks, incorporating a quadratic time-dependent demand function, holding costs, deterioration, production, and setup costs. In the fuzzy model, the key parameters were represented using trapezoidal fuzzy numbers, and the centroid method was applied for defuzzification. Mathematica 14.0, was used to compute the optimal cycle time and total cost for both systems. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the impact of variations in each parameter. Results The fuzzy inventory model produced a lower total cost ($57.06) compared to the crisp model ($143.33), reflecting an 86.11% reduction. The fuzzy system also demonstrated improved robustness to changes in production rate, setup cost, and deterioration rate. Both models produced similar economic order quantities, but were more economical and flexible to parameter variations. Sensitivity analysis proved that the system was more sensitive to minor changes in input values for the crisp model, raising the overall cost higher than that of the fuzzy model. Conclusions Fuzzy inventory systems can address demand uncertainty and cost variability in the automotive industry. It can be noted that applying inventory planning within fuzzy logic can save costs and aid in reacting better to fluctuations in the market. Such applications can be applied to companies considering the high demand and production variability. Subsequent studies can further develop multi-item models and combine stochastic lead times or dynamic prices.</ns3:p>

F1000ResearchVol. 14
Saudi Electronic University (SA), Uttaranchal University (IN), Taylor's University (MY)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.