Are “male depression” measures empirically distinct from externalizing dimensions? Testing incremental validity beyond disinhibition in a purposive community sample.
Authors
Michael E. Addis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7921-2406)
Douglas Gazarian (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4186-5006)
Are “male depression” measures empirically distinct from externalizing dimensions? Testing incremental validity beyond disinhibition in a purposive community sample.
Michael E. Addis, Douglas Gazarian
Journal
Psychology of Men & Masculinity
Topics
Gender Roles and Identity Studies
article
Are “male depression” measures empirically distinct from externalizing dimensions? Testing incremental validity beyond disinhibition in a purposive community sample.
Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.
Summarize Papers & Methodologies
Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.
Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics
Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.
Connect Distant Disciplines
Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.
Are “male depression” measures empirically distinct from externalizing dimensions? Testing incremental validity beyond disinhibition in a purposive community sample. — Michael E. Addis, Douglas Gazarian · Psychology of Men & Masculinity (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS