Best Practices for Diagnostic Evaluation of Unintentional Weight Loss

Evidence-based guidance for the evaluation of unintentional weight loss (UWL) is lacking. Using electronic health record data, common diagnostic tests ordered among patients with UWL were identified, as well as their usefulness, by comparing rates of abnormalities to patients without UWL and reviewing reports. Only 38% of cases of UWL were recognized by physicians. Among 1471 patients with recognized UWL, a wide variety of laboratory tests (eg, thyroid-stimulating hormone, complete blood count, prostate specific antigen) potentially related to UWL evaluation were ordered. None of these was more likely to be abnormal in patients with recognized UWL compared with patients without UWL. Neither upper or lower endoscopy nor imaging was found to be useful in identifying a cause. With a stakeholder panel, we developed a conservative approach to UWL. Routine diagnostic evaluation of patients with UWL is not recommended. Patients should monitor their weight weekly as a useful indicator of overall health and undergo recommended routine cancer screening.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Medical Quality
Published
2026-01-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/jmq.0000000000000281
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Best Practices for Diagnostic Evaluation of Unintentional Weight Loss

Beverly Koepf, Mark F. Beno, Kelsey Ufholz, Harry Menegay et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

Best Practices for Diagnostic Evaluation of Unintentional Weight Loss

Beverly Koepf, Mark F. Beno, Kelsey Ufholz, Harry Menegay, Goutham Rao, Sunah Song, Sarah Koopman-Gonzalez
article en

Abstract

Evidence-based guidance for the evaluation of unintentional weight loss (UWL) is lacking. Using electronic health record data, common diagnostic tests ordered among patients with UWL were identified, as well as their usefulness, by comparing rates of abnormalities to patients without UWL and reviewing reports. Only 38% of cases of UWL were recognized by physicians. Among 1471 patients with recognized UWL, a wide variety of laboratory tests (eg, thyroid-stimulating hormone, complete blood count, prostate specific antigen) potentially related to UWL evaluation were ordered. None of these was more likely to be abnormal in patients with recognized UWL compared with patients without UWL. Neither upper or lower endoscopy nor imaging was found to be useful in identifying a cause. With a stakeholder panel, we developed a conservative approach to UWL. Routine diagnostic evaluation of patients with UWL is not recommended. Patients should monitor their weight weekly as a useful indicator of overall health and undergo recommended routine cancer screening.

American Journal of Medical QualityVol. 41(2)
University Hospitals of Cleveland (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.