Citation of classical research by doctoral-level LIS scholars in Indian universities: A study

Background In many domains of knowledge, a vast amount of academic literature is available, resulting in dynamic shifts in the information demands of researchers in any subject. They require current data at a specific moment. Objectives The study’s goals were to determine how old papers are in the modern day, find out how many citations Indian academics often cite, and investigate which national and international publications Indian scholars prefer. Methodology Citation analysis methodologies were used to achieve the aims of the study. Findings The conclusions are based on a review of 18,638 references submitted to five of India’s leading LIS universities. According to a study, PhD level library and information science scholars mention on average 32-year-old materials, with 132.18 references cited on average in their thesis. Suggestions The researchers concluded that the study strongly advises that library and information science academics pay close attention to emerging or novel research ideas in the area rather than relying on well-established notions. Supervisors and LIS departments in India can realistically use these findings as a criterion to assess and even guide doctoral research methodologies. This insight could lead to new approaches to integrating more contemporary research and creative concepts into LIS doctoral work, which could influence research training and curriculum focus.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alexandria The Journal of National and International Library and Information Issues
Published
2026-01-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09557490251414715
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Citation of classical research by doctoral-level LIS scholars in Indian universities: A study

Vinit Kumar, Avinash Kumar Singh, Varsha Singh
Alexandria The Journal of National and International Library and Information Issues
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
article

Citation of classical research by doctoral-level LIS scholars in Indian universities: A study

Vinit Kumar, Avinash Kumar Singh, Varsha Singh
article en

Abstract

Background In many domains of knowledge, a vast amount of academic literature is available, resulting in dynamic shifts in the information demands of researchers in any subject. They require current data at a specific moment. Objectives The study’s goals were to determine how old papers are in the modern day, find out how many citations Indian academics often cite, and investigate which national and international publications Indian scholars prefer. Methodology Citation analysis methodologies were used to achieve the aims of the study. Findings The conclusions are based on a review of 18,638 references submitted to five of India’s leading LIS universities. According to a study, PhD level library and information science scholars mention on average 32-year-old materials, with 132.18 references cited on average in their thesis. Suggestions The researchers concluded that the study strongly advises that library and information science academics pay close attention to emerging or novel research ideas in the area rather than relying on well-established notions. Supervisors and LIS departments in India can realistically use these findings as a criterion to assess and even guide doctoral research methodologies. This insight could lead to new approaches to integrating more contemporary research and creative concepts into LIS doctoral work, which could influence research training and curriculum focus.

Alexandria The Journal of National and International Library and Information Issues
Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University (IN), Information and Library Network (IN), Central University of Gujarat (IN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.