Neighborhood-level deprivation measures in the United States: a scoping review and reference guide for investigators

The extent to which existing measures cover the spectrum of neighborhood-level social determinants of health (SDOH) has not yet been assessed. This review compared the content of U.S.-based neighborhood-level SDOH measures and summarized the use of these measures in empirical research. We conducted a comprehensive search on PubMed and Google Scholar, identifying review articles published from 1990–2023, and complemented this search by manually examining the original articles on measure development. We identified 85 measures and categorized them into two groups (42 with a specific name and 43 with no name) and used a framework including 14 domains of neighborhood-level adversity to classify the content of each measure. Most measures captured the domains of “income/wealth” (96.5% of the 85 measures included a relevant measurement indicator), “employment” (87.1%), “education” (83.5%), “housing” (64.7%), and “demographic/family structure” (60.0%). The most popular measures were the “Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards Index” (87.4 citations per year), “Neighborhood Concentrated Disadvantage” (77.6 citations per year), and “Child Opportunity Index 2.0” (53.5 citations per year). A better understanding of the content coverage and use frequency of U.S.-based neighborhood-level adversity measures will facilitate clinical/health services research to select appropriate measures when assessing the effect of neighborhood-level SDOH on health outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-01-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-26003-x
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neighborhood-level deprivation measures in the United States: a scoping review and reference guide for investigators

Madeline R. Horan, Yikyung Park, Armstrong Gt, Mary G. Nusloch et al.
BMC Public Health
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Neighborhood-level deprivation measures in the United States: a scoping review and reference guide for investigators

Madeline R. Horan, Yikyung Park, Armstrong Gt, Mary G. Nusloch, MM Hudson, Jaesung Choi, I-Chan Huang, Kirsten K. Ness
article en

Abstract

The extent to which existing measures cover the spectrum of neighborhood-level social determinants of health (SDOH) has not yet been assessed. This review compared the content of U.S.-based neighborhood-level SDOH measures and summarized the use of these measures in empirical research. We conducted a comprehensive search on PubMed and Google Scholar, identifying review articles published from 1990–2023, and complemented this search by manually examining the original articles on measure development. We identified 85 measures and categorized them into two groups (42 with a specific name and 43 with no name) and used a framework including 14 domains of neighborhood-level adversity to classify the content of each measure. Most measures captured the domains of “income/wealth” (96.5% of the 85 measures included a relevant measurement indicator), “employment” (87.1%), “education” (83.5%), “housing” (64.7%), and “demographic/family structure” (60.0%). The most popular measures were the “Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards Index” (87.4 citations per year), “Neighborhood Concentrated Disadvantage” (77.6 citations per year), and “Child Opportunity Index 2.0” (53.5 citations per year). A better understanding of the content coverage and use frequency of U.S.-based neighborhood-level adversity measures will facilitate clinical/health services research to select appropriate measures when assessing the effect of neighborhood-level SDOH on health outcomes.

BMC Public HealthVol. 26(1)
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (US), George Washington University (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Wake Forest University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.