Deliberative democracy and law-making in the digital era

This paper deals with codification and institutionalization of deliberativedemocracy among member states and EU institutions in the scope of democraticcohesion in the digital era. The general approach is based on the premise thatinnovations in deliberative democracy triggered by digitalization and newtechnologies need to be institutionalized in the legal systems of member statesaccording to a set of legal standards that stem from the EU acquis in order to maintaindemocratic cohesion in the law-making process. The main objective of this paper is toanalyse the necessity of institutionalizing deliberative democracy processes in theframework of EU democracies. The hypothesis is that codification andinstitutionalization of deliberative democracy is necessary to preserve democraticcohesion among EU member states and also to guarantee citizens ́ entitlements. As formethodology, data collection and data analysis constitute the bulk of the research. Datacollection relies on literature, and EU legislation. Data analysis is based on legalreasoning, mainly. The conclusion is that citizens’ participation needs to be securedand guaranteed by means of a set of core principles base on the EU acquis in order topreserve democratic cohesion among member states. Otherwise, no rights areconferred to citizens and deliberative processes operate at the discretion of publicauthorities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EURINT
Published
2025-12-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47743/eurint-2025-gar
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deliberative democracy and law-making in the digital era

María Jesús García García
EURINT
Social Media and Politics
article

Deliberative democracy and law-making in the digital era

María Jesús García García
article en

Abstract

This paper deals with codification and institutionalization of deliberativedemocracy among member states and EU institutions in the scope of democraticcohesion in the digital era. The general approach is based on the premise thatinnovations in deliberative democracy triggered by digitalization and newtechnologies need to be institutionalized in the legal systems of member statesaccording to a set of legal standards that stem from the EU acquis in order to maintaindemocratic cohesion in the law-making process. The main objective of this paper is toanalyse the necessity of institutionalizing deliberative democracy processes in theframework of EU democracies. The hypothesis is that codification andinstitutionalization of deliberative democracy is necessary to preserve democraticcohesion among EU member states and also to guarantee citizens ́ entitlements. As formethodology, data collection and data analysis constitute the bulk of the research. Datacollection relies on literature, and EU legislation. Data analysis is based on legalreasoning, mainly. The conclusion is that citizens’ participation needs to be securedand guaranteed by means of a set of core principles base on the EU acquis in order topreserve democratic cohesion among member states. Otherwise, no rights areconferred to citizens and deliberative processes operate at the discretion of publicauthorities.

EURINTVol. 12
Universitat de València (ES)
European Commission
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.