T cell assays for non-clinical immunogenicity risk assessment: best practices recommended by the European Immunogenicity Platform

<i>In vitro</i> and <i>in silico</i> tools help drug developers reduce unwanted immunogenicity of biologics at the design stage. These include assays that examine different immune system processes leading to anti-drug antibody (ADA) or cytotoxic cellular response development, such as activation and peptide presentation by antigen-presenting cells, and CD4+ or CD8+ T cell activation, proliferation, and specificity. The CD4+ T cell response is critical for establishing persistent, class-switched and affinity-matured ADA that are more likely to have a clinical impact. Various formats of CD4+ T cell assays raise concerns about quality, variability, and validity across laboratories. Harmonization on some key aspects of these assays is achievable, although full standardization among industry and academic labs is unlikely. Thus, the European Immunogenicity Platform Non-Clinical Immunogenicity Risk Assessment working group (EIP-NCIRA) sought to establish good practices to maximize data confidence and ensure consistent data interpretation within each assay format. The recommendations presented regard key assay parameters that will better ensure consistency across the field including donor selection, cell and test article quality control, data analysis, as well as implementation of standard controls to further reduce analytical variability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Immunology
Published
2026-01-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1723110
Primary Topic
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

T cell assays for non-clinical immunogenicity risk assessment: best practices recommended by the European Immunogenicity Platform

Chloé Ackaert, Marc Rosenbaum, Sophie Tourdot, Timothy P. Hickling et al.
Frontiers in Immunology
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
article

T cell assays for non-clinical immunogenicity risk assessment: best practices recommended by the European Immunogenicity Platform

Chloé Ackaert, Marc Rosenbaum, Sophie Tourdot, Timothy P. Hickling, Anette Karle, Maryam Ahmadi, Annelies W. Turksma, Pauline Le Vu, Michael Gutknecht
article en

Abstract

<i>In vitro</i> and <i>in silico</i> tools help drug developers reduce unwanted immunogenicity of biologics at the design stage. These include assays that examine different immune system processes leading to anti-drug antibody (ADA) or cytotoxic cellular response development, such as activation and peptide presentation by antigen-presenting cells, and CD4+ or CD8+ T cell activation, proliferation, and specificity. The CD4+ T cell response is critical for establishing persistent, class-switched and affinity-matured ADA that are more likely to have a clinical impact. Various formats of CD4+ T cell assays raise concerns about quality, variability, and validity across laboratories. Harmonization on some key aspects of these assays is achievable, although full standardization among industry and academic labs is unlikely. Thus, the European Immunogenicity Platform Non-Clinical Immunogenicity Risk Assessment working group (EIP-NCIRA) sought to establish good practices to maximize data confidence and ensure consistent data interpretation within each assay format. The recommendations presented regard key assay parameters that will better ensure consistency across the field including donor selection, cell and test article quality control, data analysis, as well as implementation of standard controls to further reduce analytical variability.

Frontiers in ImmunologyVol. 16
Roche (Switzerland) (CH), Novartis (Switzerland) (CH), Pfizer (United States) (US), IQVIA (United Kingdom) (GB), Hexal (Germany) (DE), Abzena (United Kingdom) (GB), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Industry, innovation and infrastructure, Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.