Clinical evaluation of digital versus conventional impression in edentulous patients with flabby ridges: a randomized controlled clinical trial

The optimal impression technique for flabby ridge cases remains ambiguous despite the advancements in impression techniques. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to compare the Oral Health Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) and retention of maxillary dentures fabricated from intraoral scanning (IOS) versus window impression technique in completely edentulous patients with maxillary flabby ridges. The study utilized a crossover design, where participants were randomly assigned to receive conventional complete dentures fabricated by using two different techniques for complete denture fabrication: one utilizing conventional impression method (Group I dentures) and the other employing digital impression technique (Group II dentures). OHRQoL and retention of maxillary dentures were evaluated at baseline (T0), 3 months (T3), and after 6 months (T6). A new complete denture was delivered for each participant after 6 months, with those initially receiving Group I dentures transitioning to Group II dentures, and vice versa. Comparison between groups using paired t-test, while comparison between different time points was performed by using Repeated Measures ANOVA test followed by Tukey’s Post Hoc test. The significant level was set to be at P ≤ 0.05. Both groups reported improvement in OHRQoL with no significant difference between groups at six months follow-up period (P < 0.0001). Additionally, both groups reported a decline in denture retention at the follow up periods with no significant difference between groups at six months follow-up period (P < 0.0001). Digital impression is a viable alternative to conventional impression in the fabrication of complete dentures for edentulous arches with flabby ridges with similar outcomes in terms of OHRQoL and denture retention. The study protocol was retrospectively registered and posted on the ClinicalTrials.gov public website (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT07108322) on August 7, 2025.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-01-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-07524-8
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical evaluation of digital versus conventional impression in edentulous patients with flabby ridges: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Dina Mohamed Elawady, Sherin Samir Matta, Ahmed Yehia Abdel-Moneim, Wafaa Ibrahim Ibrahim
BMC Oral Health
Dental materials and restorations
article

Clinical evaluation of digital versus conventional impression in edentulous patients with flabby ridges: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Dina Mohamed Elawady, Sherin Samir Matta, Ahmed Yehia Abdel-Moneim, Wafaa Ibrahim Ibrahim
article en

Abstract

The optimal impression technique for flabby ridge cases remains ambiguous despite the advancements in impression techniques. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to compare the Oral Health Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) and retention of maxillary dentures fabricated from intraoral scanning (IOS) versus window impression technique in completely edentulous patients with maxillary flabby ridges. The study utilized a crossover design, where participants were randomly assigned to receive conventional complete dentures fabricated by using two different techniques for complete denture fabrication: one utilizing conventional impression method (Group I dentures) and the other employing digital impression technique (Group II dentures). OHRQoL and retention of maxillary dentures were evaluated at baseline (T0), 3 months (T3), and after 6 months (T6). A new complete denture was delivered for each participant after 6 months, with those initially receiving Group I dentures transitioning to Group II dentures, and vice versa. Comparison between groups using paired t-test, while comparison between different time points was performed by using Repeated Measures ANOVA test followed by Tukey’s Post Hoc test. The significant level was set to be at P ≤ 0.05. Both groups reported improvement in OHRQoL with no significant difference between groups at six months follow-up period (P < 0.0001). Additionally, both groups reported a decline in denture retention at the follow up periods with no significant difference between groups at six months follow-up period (P < 0.0001). Digital impression is a viable alternative to conventional impression in the fabrication of complete dentures for edentulous arches with flabby ridges with similar outcomes in terms of OHRQoL and denture retention. The study protocol was retrospectively registered and posted on the ClinicalTrials.gov public website (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT07108322) on August 7, 2025.

BMC Oral HealthVol. 26(1)
Delta University for Science and Technology (EG), October University of Modern Sciences and Arts (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.