Consensus guidelines for initial management of neutropenic fever

This update of the Australasian consensus guidelines for the initial empiric management of neutropenic fever occurs in the context of major changes in cancer treatment paradigms, as well as advances in the management of sepsis and new models of care for infections since the last version of these guidelines in 2011. Acknowledging the important role of antimicrobials in the disruption of the gut microbiome and emerging antimicrobial resistance, as well as the changing epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance more broadly, these guidelines address current evidence for optimal empiric neutropenic fever therapy. A writing group - including adult and paediatric representatives across infectious diseases, microbiology, haematology, transplant and oncology, as well as across craft groups, including medicine, nursing and pharmacy - was developed to produce and address key management questions. This was overseen by a steering committee, which included consumer representation. Using an extensive review of the literature, these guidelines provide consensus recommendations with evidence grading for initial empiric management of neutropenic fever in adults and children, including recommended investigations, antimicrobial therapy and approach to patients with beta-lactam allergy or risk factors for multidrug-resistant infection. Management beyond the first 72 h is discussed in separate chapters of this issue: the Subsequent Management (for high-risk neutropenic fever) and Ambulatory Management (for low-risk neutropenic fever) chapters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Internal Medicine Journal
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70248
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consensus guidelines for initial management of neutropenic fever

Amy C. Legg, Ashish Bajel, Jason A. Trubiano, Olivia Bupha‐Intr et al.
5 citations
Internal Medicine Journal
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
5.23
article

Consensus guidelines for initial management of neutropenic fever

Amy C. Legg, Ashish Bajel, Jason A. Trubiano, Olivia Bupha‐Intr, Paul Kinsella, Brendan McMullan, Karin Thursky, Jay Roberts, Nicholas Laundy, Robert Weinkove, Natalie Yap, Abby P. Douglas, Rachel Conyers, Louise Cooley, Kylie Alcorn
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This update of the Australasian consensus guidelines for the initial empiric management of neutropenic fever occurs in the context of major changes in cancer treatment paradigms, as well as advances in the management of sepsis and new models of care for infections since the last version of these guidelines in 2011. Acknowledging the important role of antimicrobials in the disruption of the gut microbiome and emerging antimicrobial resistance, as well as the changing epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance more broadly, these guidelines address current evidence for optimal empiric neutropenic fever therapy. A writing group - including adult and paediatric representatives across infectious diseases, microbiology, haematology, transplant and oncology, as well as across craft groups, including medicine, nursing and pharmacy - was developed to produce and address key management questions. This was overseen by a steering committee, which included consumer representation. Using an extensive review of the literature, these guidelines provide consensus recommendations with evidence grading for initial empiric management of neutropenic fever in adults and children, including recommended investigations, antimicrobial therapy and approach to patients with beta-lactam allergy or risk factors for multidrug-resistant infection. Management beyond the first 72 h is discussed in separate chapters of this issue: the Subsequent Management (for high-risk neutropenic fever) and Ambulatory Management (for low-risk neutropenic fever) chapters.

Internal Medicine JournalVol. 55(S7)
Griffith University (AU), University of Tasmania (AU), Queensland Health (AU), The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU), Royal Children's Hospital (AU), University of Auckland (NZ), The University of Queensland (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Université de Montpellier (FR), Malaghan Institute of Medical Research (NZ), Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (AU), Gold Coast Hospital (AU), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU), Wellington Hospital (NZ), Royal Hobart Hospital (AU), Charles Darwin University (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Menzies School of Health Research (AU), Metro South Health (AU), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes (FR), Capital and Coast District Health Board (NZ), Sydney Children's Hospital (AU), Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU), Austin Health (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
5.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.