Comparative evaluation of machine learning models for thrust force estimation in aluminum 5083 H111

Abstract This study investigates the comparative performance of four different supervised machine learning algorithms for the prediction of maximum thrust force F z max during the drilling process of aluminum 5083 H111 alloy. Accurate prediction of the forces generated during drilling operations is of great importance for extending tool life, increasing hole quality and improving production efficiency. In this direction, a total of 27 experimental conditions were created including three different cutting speeds (80, 100, 120 m min −1 ), three different feed rates (0.06, 0.09, 0.12 mm tooth −1 ) and three different cooling strategies (dry, air, liquid) and the maximum thrust force was measured for each condition. Artificial neural networks (ANN), decision trees (DT), random forest (RF) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithms were trained with the obtained data set and evaluated by MAE, RMSE and R 2 performance metrics. The findings revealed that the XGBoost algorithm achieved the lowest error rates (MAE: 56.742 N, RMSE: 67.179 N) and the highest explanatory power ( R 2 : 0.929) compared to other models. These results show that ensemble-based methods can be used as reliable and effective estimation tools in production processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials Testing
Published
2026-01-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2025-0389
Primary Topic
Advanced machining processes and optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of machine learning models for thrust force estimation in aluminum 5083 H111

Neslihan Özsoy, Deniz Demircioğlu Diren, Murat Özsoy, Emre Teke
Materials Testing
Advanced machining processes and optimization
article

Comparative evaluation of machine learning models for thrust force estimation in aluminum 5083 H111

Neslihan Özsoy, Deniz Demircioğlu Diren, Murat Özsoy, Emre Teke
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the comparative performance of four different supervised machine learning algorithms for the prediction of maximum thrust force F z max during the drilling process of aluminum 5083 H111 alloy. Accurate prediction of the forces generated during drilling operations is of great importance for extending tool life, increasing hole quality and improving production efficiency. In this direction, a total of 27 experimental conditions were created including three different cutting speeds (80, 100, 120 m min −1 ), three different feed rates (0.06, 0.09, 0.12 mm tooth −1 ) and three different cooling strategies (dry, air, liquid) and the maximum thrust force was measured for each condition. Artificial neural networks (ANN), decision trees (DT), random forest (RF) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithms were trained with the obtained data set and evaluated by MAE, RMSE and R 2 performance metrics. The findings revealed that the XGBoost algorithm achieved the lowest error rates (MAE: 56.742 N, RMSE: 67.179 N) and the highest explanatory power ( R 2 : 0.929) compared to other models. These results show that ensemble-based methods can be used as reliable and effective estimation tools in production processes.

Materials TestingVol. 68(3)
Sakarya University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Advanced machining processes and optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative evaluation of machine learning models for thrust force estimation in aluminum 5083 H111 — Neslihan Özsoy, Deniz Demircioğlu Diren, et al. · Materials Testing (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS