Physiology- versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for people with coronary artery disease
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: Primary objectives To evaluate the benefits and harms of physiology-guided PCI compared to angiography-guided PCI for cardiovascular events in individuals with CCS and ACS. Secondary objectives To assess potential differences in the effectiveness and safety of physiology-guided PCI according to patient characteristics, including sex and age, from the perspective of equity.
Authors
- Satoshi Higuchi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7914-8256)
- Noyuri Yamaji (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4212-6723)
- Marie Ito (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5515-2851)
- Yuya Yokota
- Erika Ota
- Hisashi Noma
- Takeshi Hasegawa
Institutions
- SHOWA Medical University (JP)
- St. Luke's International University (JP)
- University of Tokyo Health Sciences (JP)
- The Institute of Statistical Mathematics (JP)
- SHOWA Medical University Fujigaoka Hospital (JP)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Published
- 2026-01-12
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd016318
- Primary Topic
- Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Nara Medical University