AI and Strategic Decisions: Facing the Incompleteness

Abstract This study examines the role of artificial intelligence (AI) systems—and the related legal requirements—in strategic corporate governance decisions, characterised by a high degree of incompleteness and, consequently, discretion. It illustrates the inadequacy of current European regulatory developments in the information technology field, primarily based on a product liability approach, to govern the complexities underlying the introduction of AI tools in the strategic choices made by directors. Given the core elements of corporate governance and its specific accountability needs, the study demonstrates how algorithmic decision-making cannot be an exclusive strategy for strategic decisions characterised by unpredictability and incompleteness. Therefore, the ultimate objective of the analysis is to underscore the persisting gap in legislation regarding the need to shift from a product-based and risk-minimisation approach in AI-driven decision-making to an integrated approach wherein the decision-making process is shaped by the complex, yet balanced, interaction between two distinct decision-making components, namely humans and the algorithm. To this end, the paper advocates for a stronger emphasis on human enhancement, algorithm ergonomics, and a legal strategy-driven design of AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Business Organization Law Review
Published
2026-01-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-025-00356-7
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI and Strategic Decisions: Facing the Incompleteness

Michele Mozzarelli, Giulia Schneider
European Business Organization Law Review
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

AI and Strategic Decisions: Facing the Incompleteness

Michele Mozzarelli, Giulia Schneider
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study examines the role of artificial intelligence (AI) systems—and the related legal requirements—in strategic corporate governance decisions, characterised by a high degree of incompleteness and, consequently, discretion. It illustrates the inadequacy of current European regulatory developments in the information technology field, primarily based on a product liability approach, to govern the complexities underlying the introduction of AI tools in the strategic choices made by directors. Given the core elements of corporate governance and its specific accountability needs, the study demonstrates how algorithmic decision-making cannot be an exclusive strategy for strategic decisions characterised by unpredictability and incompleteness. Therefore, the ultimate objective of the analysis is to underscore the persisting gap in legislation regarding the need to shift from a product-based and risk-minimisation approach in AI-driven decision-making to an integrated approach wherein the decision-making process is shaped by the complex, yet balanced, interaction between two distinct decision-making components, namely humans and the algorithm. To this end, the paper advocates for a stronger emphasis on human enhancement, algorithm ergonomics, and a legal strategy-driven design of AI.

European Business Organization Law Review
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna (IT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AI and Strategic Decisions: Facing the Incompleteness — Michele Mozzarelli, Giulia Schneider · European Business Organization Law Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS