Comparison of Second-Stage Recovery Methods for Reusable Launch Vehicles Across Vehicle Scales

With the cost-saving benefits of reusable launch vehicles (RLVs), South Korea is pursuing the application of reusability technologies to KSLV-III. While SpaceX currently reuses only the first stage of Falcon 9, the Starship program aims for full-stage recovery, motivating further examination of second-stage reuse. This study extends the scope of the analysis to medium-class launch vehicles and evaluates the feasibility of second-stage reuse for two vehicle scales. The performance losses associated with three recovery methods—vertical landing, parachute, and fly-back—are quantitatively assessed using conceptual-level recovery system design and simplified mass modeling. For KSLV-III, a conceptual expendable medium-class launch vehicle capable of delivering a 10-ton payload to a 200 km low Earth orbit (LEO) was designed using an algebraic modeling approach. Based on this reference design, the recovery methods were evaluated for both medium-class and super-heavy-class vehicles. Results of the present order-of-magnitude conceptual trade study show that, for medium-class vehicles, the parachute provides the highest performance, followed by fly-back, while vertical landing yields the lowest. For super-heavy vehicles, the parachute remains the most effective, but vertical landing becomes the second-best option, with fly-back exhibiting the lowest performance. As the vehicle scale increases, parachute effectiveness declines, fly-back performance improves, and vertical landing shows the greatest performance gains. However, parachute becomes impractical for super-heavy vehicles due to structural limitations, making vertical landing the most viable option. In contrast, medium-class vehicles do not necessarily require vertical landing, and the optimal recovery strategy should be chosen based on vehicle structural characteristics and mission objectives. This study provides insights that support the selection of efficient recovery strategies during the early design phase of RLVs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aerospace
Published
2026-01-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace13010079
Primary Topic
Aerospace Engineering and Energy Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Second-Stage Recovery Methods for Reusable Launch Vehicles Across Vehicle Scales

Jeong‐Yeol Choi, Min-Seon Jo, Geun-Jeong Lee
Aerospace
Aerospace Engineering and Energy Systems
article

Comparison of Second-Stage Recovery Methods for Reusable Launch Vehicles Across Vehicle Scales

Jeong‐Yeol Choi, Min-Seon Jo, Geun-Jeong Lee
article en

Abstract

With the cost-saving benefits of reusable launch vehicles (RLVs), South Korea is pursuing the application of reusability technologies to KSLV-III. While SpaceX currently reuses only the first stage of Falcon 9, the Starship program aims for full-stage recovery, motivating further examination of second-stage reuse. This study extends the scope of the analysis to medium-class launch vehicles and evaluates the feasibility of second-stage reuse for two vehicle scales. The performance losses associated with three recovery methods—vertical landing, parachute, and fly-back—are quantitatively assessed using conceptual-level recovery system design and simplified mass modeling. For KSLV-III, a conceptual expendable medium-class launch vehicle capable of delivering a 10-ton payload to a 200 km low Earth orbit (LEO) was designed using an algebraic modeling approach. Based on this reference design, the recovery methods were evaluated for both medium-class and super-heavy-class vehicles. Results of the present order-of-magnitude conceptual trade study show that, for medium-class vehicles, the parachute provides the highest performance, followed by fly-back, while vertical landing yields the lowest. For super-heavy vehicles, the parachute remains the most effective, but vertical landing becomes the second-best option, with fly-back exhibiting the lowest performance. As the vehicle scale increases, parachute effectiveness declines, fly-back performance improves, and vertical landing shows the greatest performance gains. However, parachute becomes impractical for super-heavy vehicles due to structural limitations, making vertical landing the most viable option. In contrast, medium-class vehicles do not necessarily require vertical landing, and the optimal recovery strategy should be chosen based on vehicle structural characteristics and mission objectives. This study provides insights that support the selection of efficient recovery strategies during the early design phase of RLVs.

AerospaceVol. 13(1)
Pusan National University (KR)
Ministry of Education, India
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Aerospace Engineering and Energy Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.