Exploring household preferences for ecosystem services as a basis for strategic land use and conservation planning

In rapidly changing tropical landscapes, large-scale resource exploitation threatens biodiversity, ecosystem services (ES) and human well-being. This study examines land use, ES and ecosystem disservices (EDS) in Savannakhet Province, Laos, focusing on household preferences amid shifting land use patterns. Using a survey of 336 households across 22 villages, we assessed preferences for 63 ES and 16 EDS, along with key land types providing or causing them. Our results highlight the great value attached to collecting wild plants for food, energy, medicine and handicrafts, and of landscape elements with cultural and spiritual meaning. Forests, residential areas and paddy fields are the most valued land types, while tree and agricultural plantations are considered less significant sources of ES. Provisioning ES (such as crop and tree cultivation, livestock keeping and wild plant collection) as well as regulation and maintenance ES (including disaster protection and water quality maintenance) are highly valued across all ecological zones. Among cultural ES, landscapes supporting health, recreation and education are also widely appreciated across all zones, while the transfer of ecological knowledge is particularly valued in subsistence-oriented areas. EDS perceptions vary, with floods, erosion, drought and fire being major concerns. Human–wildlife conflicts and pest outbreaks have intensified in recent years. Challenges in ES provision are attributed mainly to climate change, land access restrictions and resource overharvesting. Our study underscores the need for participatory land use planning that integrates local knowledge and prioritizes multifunctional landscapes to achieve equitable and sustainable land governance in Laos and similar tropical regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecosystems and People
Published
2026-01-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2025.2611227
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
36.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring household preferences for ecosystem services as a basis for strategic land use and conservation planning

Madlaina Michelotti, Andreas Heinimann, Phetsaphone Thanasack, Julie G. Zaehringer et al.
1 citations
Ecosystems and People
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
36.62
article

Exploring household preferences for ecosystem services as a basis for strategic land use and conservation planning

Madlaina Michelotti, Andreas Heinimann, Phetsaphone Thanasack, Julie G. Zaehringer, Michael Epprecht
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In rapidly changing tropical landscapes, large-scale resource exploitation threatens biodiversity, ecosystem services (ES) and human well-being. This study examines land use, ES and ecosystem disservices (EDS) in Savannakhet Province, Laos, focusing on household preferences amid shifting land use patterns. Using a survey of 336 households across 22 villages, we assessed preferences for 63 ES and 16 EDS, along with key land types providing or causing them. Our results highlight the great value attached to collecting wild plants for food, energy, medicine and handicrafts, and of landscape elements with cultural and spiritual meaning. Forests, residential areas and paddy fields are the most valued land types, while tree and agricultural plantations are considered less significant sources of ES. Provisioning ES (such as crop and tree cultivation, livestock keeping and wild plant collection) as well as regulation and maintenance ES (including disaster protection and water quality maintenance) are highly valued across all ecological zones. Among cultural ES, landscapes supporting health, recreation and education are also widely appreciated across all zones, while the transfer of ecological knowledge is particularly valued in subsistence-oriented areas. EDS perceptions vary, with floods, erosion, drought and fire being major concerns. Human–wildlife conflicts and pest outbreaks have intensified in recent years. Challenges in ES provision are attributed mainly to climate change, land access restrictions and resource overharvesting. Our study underscores the need for participatory land use planning that integrates local knowledge and prioritizes multifunctional landscapes to achieve equitable and sustainable land governance in Laos and similar tropical regions.

Ecosystems and PeopleVol. 22(1)
University of Bern (CH), Swiss Academy of Sciences (CH)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
36.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.