P-1421. Impact of a Community Health Worker and Pharmacist Led Vaccine Gap Closure Program in Missouri

Abstract Background Significant gaps in vaccination rates exist, with only 22.8% of US adults receiving all age-appropriate vaccines in 2022. As trusted community members, community health workers (CHWs) are uniquely positioned to address vaccine hesitancy and provide culturally appropriate services. A statewide Missouri community vaccination program led by pharmacists and CHWs was implemented to overcome barriers to vaccination by delivering vaccines outside clinic settings, addressing vaccine hesitancy, and covering costs when needed. This study analyzed the impact of this vaccination initiative. Methods A retrospective review of clinical records from the Missouri community vaccination program was conducted. Patients were included if they had ≥ 1 encounter with the program. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize patient demographics, social needs, and the types of vaccines given. The primary outcome was the percent of patients that received ≥ 1 vaccine. The secondary outcomes were to report the rate of vaccination among patients who received vaccine hesitancy counseling and to describe the insurance type associated with a cost barrier due to copays. Results The vaccination program was held from September 2024 to October 2024 and included 9,036 patients with a mean age of 56.6 years (Table 1). Self-identified health-related social needs were most commonly financial insecurity (24%), limited access to care (20%), and lack of health insurance (14%) (Table 2). Patients received ≥ 1 vaccine and vaccine hesitancy counseling at 81.4% and 51.4% of encounters respectively (Table 3). In total, at the 10,769 encounters, 12,383 vaccines were administered. After vaccine hesitancy counseling, which was provided for 9,395 vaccines, vaccines were administered 64% of the time. The most frequently administered vaccines were influenza (n=6,618), covid-19 (n=3,550), pneumococcal (n=557), and shingles (n=545) vaccines. Cost barriers due to vaccination copays were most often reported among patients who are self-pay, uninsured, or have commercial insurance (Table 4). Conclusion The Missouri community vaccination program led by pharmacists and CHWs was an effective program to help close vaccination gaps regardless of geography and socioeconomic status. Disclosures John Galdo, PharmD, MBA, BCPS, BCGP, Eli Lilly: Employment, Spouse|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Takeda: Honoraria Jasmine Gonzalvo, PharmD, Lilly: Advisor/Consultant|Lilly: Honoraria

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.1608
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1421. Impact of a Community Health Worker and Pharmacist Led Vaccine Gap Closure Program in Missouri

Jasmine D. Gonzalvo, Anne Eisenbeis, John A. Galdo, Adriana Gardner et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

P-1421. Impact of a Community Health Worker and Pharmacist Led Vaccine Gap Closure Program in Missouri

Jasmine D. Gonzalvo, Anne Eisenbeis, John A. Galdo, Adriana Gardner, Rakhi Karwa
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Significant gaps in vaccination rates exist, with only 22.8% of US adults receiving all age-appropriate vaccines in 2022. As trusted community members, community health workers (CHWs) are uniquely positioned to address vaccine hesitancy and provide culturally appropriate services. A statewide Missouri community vaccination program led by pharmacists and CHWs was implemented to overcome barriers to vaccination by delivering vaccines outside clinic settings, addressing vaccine hesitancy, and covering costs when needed. This study analyzed the impact of this vaccination initiative. Methods A retrospective review of clinical records from the Missouri community vaccination program was conducted. Patients were included if they had ≥ 1 encounter with the program. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize patient demographics, social needs, and the types of vaccines given. The primary outcome was the percent of patients that received ≥ 1 vaccine. The secondary outcomes were to report the rate of vaccination among patients who received vaccine hesitancy counseling and to describe the insurance type associated with a cost barrier due to copays. Results The vaccination program was held from September 2024 to October 2024 and included 9,036 patients with a mean age of 56.6 years (Table 1). Self-identified health-related social needs were most commonly financial insecurity (24%), limited access to care (20%), and lack of health insurance (14%) (Table 2). Patients received ≥ 1 vaccine and vaccine hesitancy counseling at 81.4% and 51.4% of encounters respectively (Table 3). In total, at the 10,769 encounters, 12,383 vaccines were administered. After vaccine hesitancy counseling, which was provided for 9,395 vaccines, vaccines were administered 64% of the time. The most frequently administered vaccines were influenza (n=6,618), covid-19 (n=3,550), pneumococcal (n=557), and shingles (n=545) vaccines. Cost barriers due to vaccination copays were most often reported among patients who are self-pay, uninsured, or have commercial insurance (Table 4). Conclusion The Missouri community vaccination program led by pharmacists and CHWs was an effective program to help close vaccination gaps regardless of geography and socioeconomic status. Disclosures John Galdo, PharmD, MBA, BCPS, BCGP, Eli Lilly: Employment, Spouse|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Takeda: Honoraria Jasmine Gonzalvo, PharmD, Lilly: Advisor/Consultant|Lilly: Honoraria

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
Missouri Department of Natural Resources (US), University of Indianapolis (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Missouri Department of Agriculture (US), Instituto Nacional de Seguridad y Salud en el Trabajo (ES), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.