Age-Friendly Public Spaces in Residential Communities: A Systematic Review of Spatial Design Strategies

Population ageing has heightened the need to understand how public spaces within residential communities support older adults’ everyday outdoor activities. This systematic review synthesizes empirical evidence on spatial design strategies for age-friendly public spaces in residential communities. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted in Scopus and Web of Science to identify relevant empirical studies, which were subsequently analyzed using a thematic synthesis approach. The review consolidates recurrent intervention types into a six-dimensional framework informed by environmental gerontology and international age-friendly principles, encompassing pathway design and connectivity, resting and sitting facilities, greenery and shade provision, lighting and safety features, wayfinding and signage, and interaction and activity spaces. The findings show a strong emphasis on pathway design and resting facilities, shaped by their role as foundational environmental supports in dense residential environments and by region-specific policy and climatic conditions. Evidence gaps include limited standardization, insufficient cost-effectiveness information, and under representation of low-density or climatically distinct settings. The review clarifies how age-friendly spatial design functions within residential community public spaces and provides a structured basis for future research and community-level micro-renewal practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Institute of Interior Design Journal
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14774/jkiid.2025.34.6.067
Primary Topic
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Age-Friendly Public Spaces in Residential Communities: A Systematic Review of Spatial Design Strategies

Nayeon Kim, Jie Chen
Korean Institute of Interior Design Journal
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
article

Age-Friendly Public Spaces in Residential Communities: A Systematic Review of Spatial Design Strategies

Nayeon Kim, Jie Chen
article en

Abstract

Population ageing has heightened the need to understand how public spaces within residential communities support older adults’ everyday outdoor activities. This systematic review synthesizes empirical evidence on spatial design strategies for age-friendly public spaces in residential communities. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted in Scopus and Web of Science to identify relevant empirical studies, which were subsequently analyzed using a thematic synthesis approach. The review consolidates recurrent intervention types into a six-dimensional framework informed by environmental gerontology and international age-friendly principles, encompassing pathway design and connectivity, resting and sitting facilities, greenery and shade provision, lighting and safety features, wayfinding and signage, and interaction and activity spaces. The findings show a strong emphasis on pathway design and resting facilities, shaped by their role as foundational environmental supports in dense residential environments and by region-specific policy and climatic conditions. Evidence gaps include limited standardization, insufficient cost-effectiveness information, and under representation of low-density or climatically distinct settings. The review clarifies how age-friendly spatial design functions within residential community public spaces and provides a structured basis for future research and community-level micro-renewal practice.

Korean Institute of Interior Design JournalVol. 34(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.