P-1348. Impact of Minocycline Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations on Clinical Outcomes in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Respiratory and Bloodstream Infections

Abstract Background The Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recently lowered the minocycline breakpoint for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections from ≤ 4 to ≤ 1 mg/L due to results from one PK/PD study, however clinical data are lacking. This study assessed clinical outcomes between minocycline MICs (≤ 1 mg/L vs 2-4 mg/L) for S. maltophilia respiratory and bloodstream infections. Methods This was a retrospective, cohort study of patients ≥ 18 years of age hospitalized at NYP/CUIMC who received ≥ 48 hrs of minocycline for S. maltophilia infection. Primary outcome was frequency of treatment failure. Secondary outcomes include isolation of S. maltophilia on follow-up cultures, development of minocycline resistance, and 30-day in-hospital mortality. Characteristics were compared between groups and between those with success/failure to construct a multivariable analysis for clinical failure considering all factors with a p-value < 0.2 and including MIC group. Results 80 patients were included: 63 with MIC of ≤ 1 and 17 with MIC of 2-4 mg/L. Majority (91%) were respiratory infections with 48 (60%) of patients being mechanically ventilated, 50 (63%) in the ICU at time of infection, and 35 (44%) were immunosuppressed. There was no difference in characteristics between groups and the Pitt Bacteremia Score was 3 in the MIC ≤ 1 group compared to 4 in the MIC 2-4 group (p=0.938). Treatment failure occurred in 41 (51%): 30 (48%) in the MIC ≤ 1 group and 11 (65%) in the MIC 2-4 group (p=0.328). Mechanical ventilation [30 (73%) vs. 18 (46%); p=0.025], ICU [31 (76%) vs. 19 (49%); p=0.024], and higher median PITT bacteremia score [5 vs. 2; p=0.001] were more common in those who failed compared to those with success. In the multivariable model, MIC 2-4 mg/L was not independently associated with treatment failure [OR 2.26 (95% CI 0.615-8.40; p=0.226). Conclusion In patients who received minocycline for S. maltophilia respiratory and bloodstream infections, treatment failure did not differ between patients who had minocycline MIC of ≤ 1 mg/L compared to 2-4 mg/L. Although the results were not statistically significant, numerically there was a higher percentage of patients who failed treatment that had an MIC of 2-4 mg/L. More data with a larger sample size are needed. Disclosures Nicholas Demenagas, PharmD, Ferring Pharmaceuticals: Advisory Board

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.1536
Primary Topic
Infections and bacterial resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1348. Impact of Minocycline Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations on Clinical Outcomes in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Respiratory and Bloodstream Infections

Nicholas Demenagas, Christine J. Kubin, Adrianna Losquadro
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Infections and bacterial resistance
article

P-1348. Impact of Minocycline Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations on Clinical Outcomes in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Respiratory and Bloodstream Infections

Nicholas Demenagas, Christine J. Kubin, Adrianna Losquadro
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recently lowered the minocycline breakpoint for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections from ≤ 4 to ≤ 1 mg/L due to results from one PK/PD study, however clinical data are lacking. This study assessed clinical outcomes between minocycline MICs (≤ 1 mg/L vs 2-4 mg/L) for S. maltophilia respiratory and bloodstream infections. Methods This was a retrospective, cohort study of patients ≥ 18 years of age hospitalized at NYP/CUIMC who received ≥ 48 hrs of minocycline for S. maltophilia infection. Primary outcome was frequency of treatment failure. Secondary outcomes include isolation of S. maltophilia on follow-up cultures, development of minocycline resistance, and 30-day in-hospital mortality. Characteristics were compared between groups and between those with success/failure to construct a multivariable analysis for clinical failure considering all factors with a p-value < 0.2 and including MIC group. Results 80 patients were included: 63 with MIC of ≤ 1 and 17 with MIC of 2-4 mg/L. Majority (91%) were respiratory infections with 48 (60%) of patients being mechanically ventilated, 50 (63%) in the ICU at time of infection, and 35 (44%) were immunosuppressed. There was no difference in characteristics between groups and the Pitt Bacteremia Score was 3 in the MIC ≤ 1 group compared to 4 in the MIC 2-4 group (p=0.938). Treatment failure occurred in 41 (51%): 30 (48%) in the MIC ≤ 1 group and 11 (65%) in the MIC 2-4 group (p=0.328). Mechanical ventilation [30 (73%) vs. 18 (46%); p=0.025], ICU [31 (76%) vs. 19 (49%); p=0.024], and higher median PITT bacteremia score [5 vs. 2; p=0.001] were more common in those who failed compared to those with success. In the multivariable model, MIC 2-4 mg/L was not independently associated with treatment failure [OR 2.26 (95% CI 0.615-8.40; p=0.226). Conclusion In patients who received minocycline for S. maltophilia respiratory and bloodstream infections, treatment failure did not differ between patients who had minocycline MIC of ≤ 1 mg/L compared to 2-4 mg/L. Although the results were not statistically significant, numerically there was a higher percentage of patients who failed treatment that had an MIC of 2-4 mg/L. More data with a larger sample size are needed. Disclosures Nicholas Demenagas, PharmD, Ferring Pharmaceuticals: Advisory Board

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), New York Hospital Queens (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Infections and bacterial resistance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.