Consensus guidelines for ambulatory care for neutropenic fever

These guidelines provide updated recommendations on ambulatory care for low-risk neutropenic fever in adult and paediatric patients. National and international data support the clinical, economic and psychosocial benefits of risk stratification, and home-based or reduced intensity treatment of neutropenic fever. Benefits include shortened in-hospital length of stay, reduced healthcare costs, early intravenous to oral switch and improved patient and caregiver quality of life. Since publication of the 2011 Australian consensus guidelines, additional adult and paediatric neutropenic fever clinical decision rules have been derived and validated. These rules assist clinicians in stratifying patients into lower or higher risk of serious infection. For adult patients the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer and the Clinical Index of Stable Febrile Neutropenia scores are recommended, whereas for paediatric patients the AUS rule has been prospectively derived and validated in the Australian setting. These rules are recommended as part of a structured low-risk neutropenic fever care pathway that incorporates additional disease-level, treatment-level and patient-level safety net criteria. Key infrastructure requirements for cost-effective and safe hospital-based ambulatory neutropenic fever care are discussed, as are recommended oral antimicrobial regimens and criteria for re-admission. Biomarkers and the use of new and wearable technologies are currently not routinely recommended as part of risk stratification or monitoring. Gaps in the literature are summarised and are anticipated to be the focus of future updates to these guidelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Internal Medicine Journal
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70251
Primary Topic
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consensus guidelines for ambulatory care for neutropenic fever

David J. M. Routledge, C. Underhill, Belinda Lambros, Bhavna Padhye et al.
Internal Medicine Journal
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
article

Consensus guidelines for ambulatory care for neutropenic fever

David J. M. Routledge, C. Underhill, Belinda Lambros, Bhavna Padhye, Coen Butters, Gabrielle M. Haeusler, Michelle K. Yong, Bradley Rockliff, Nikhil Singh, Robert Weinkove, Joanne S. K. Teh, David D. C. Kong, Leon J. Worth
article en

Abstract

These guidelines provide updated recommendations on ambulatory care for low-risk neutropenic fever in adult and paediatric patients. National and international data support the clinical, economic and psychosocial benefits of risk stratification, and home-based or reduced intensity treatment of neutropenic fever. Benefits include shortened in-hospital length of stay, reduced healthcare costs, early intravenous to oral switch and improved patient and caregiver quality of life. Since publication of the 2011 Australian consensus guidelines, additional adult and paediatric neutropenic fever clinical decision rules have been derived and validated. These rules assist clinicians in stratifying patients into lower or higher risk of serious infection. For adult patients the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer and the Clinical Index of Stable Febrile Neutropenia scores are recommended, whereas for paediatric patients the AUS rule has been prospectively derived and validated in the Australian setting. These rules are recommended as part of a structured low-risk neutropenic fever care pathway that incorporates additional disease-level, treatment-level and patient-level safety net criteria. Key infrastructure requirements for cost-effective and safe hospital-based ambulatory neutropenic fever care are discussed, as are recommended oral antimicrobial regimens and criteria for re-admission. Biomarkers and the use of new and wearable technologies are currently not routinely recommended as part of risk stratification or monitoring. Gaps in the literature are summarised and are anticipated to be the focus of future updates to these guidelines.

Internal Medicine JournalVol. 55(S7)
The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU), Royal Children's Hospital (AU), University of Auckland (NZ), The University of Melbourne (AU), Malaghan Institute of Medical Research (NZ), Wesley Hospital (AU), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU), Wellington Hospital (NZ), Children's Hospital at Westmead (AU), Albury Wodonga Health (AU), Sydney Children's Hospital (AU), John Hunter Children's Hospital (AU), Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU), Monash University (AU), Monash Institute of Medical Research (AU)
Australasian Society for Infectious Diseases
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.