How well can we forecast local magnetic ground perturbations with existing space weather monitoring resources?

Abstract. In this study we examine how a deep-learning based forecast of local, ground-based geomagnetic field variations trained on solar wind parameters available in real time might be improved by including information contained in an accurate forecast of solar wind conditions. This is accomplished using a long short-term memory (LSTM) model together with magnetic field measurements made at the Rørvik magnetometer station in Mid-Norway. We use Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) satellite measurements of solar wind and interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) conditions at the first Sun-Earth Lagrange point, and historical lists of coronal mass ejection (CME) impacts at Earth to train and validate the LSTM model. We find that accurate information about the IMF Bz component and solar wind speed are important for obtaining a reasonably accurate (r² ≥ 0.5) forecast of local geomagnetic activity over forecasting horizons beyond ~ 3 h. Information about CME arrival time is only important when simultaneously accompanied by accurate, relatively high-resolution information about IMF Bz. In the absence of the latter, CME arrival time information does not contribute to model performance. This empirical result amounts to a quantitative demonstration of the widely recognized impact of IMF orientation on CME geoeffectiveness. This result also highlights that new innovations, probably in the form of new prediction capabilities of conditions in interplanetary space, will be required to produce accurate forecasts of local geomagnetic disturbances beyond a forecast horizon of 1 h.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annales Geophysicae
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-44-1259-2026
Primary Topic
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

How well can we forecast local magnetic ground perturbations with existing space weather monitoring resources?

Magnar G. Johnsen, Spencer Hatch, Kristian Solheim Thinn, Mathew J. Owens et al.
1 links
Annales Geophysicae
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
article

How well can we forecast local magnetic ground perturbations with existing space weather monitoring resources?

Magnar G. Johnsen, Spencer Hatch, Kristian Solheim Thinn, Mathew J. Owens, stephen Owino Omondi, Andreas Kvammen, Rodrigo López
article en

Abstract

Abstract. In this study we examine how a deep-learning based forecast of local, ground-based geomagnetic field variations trained on solar wind parameters available in real time might be improved by including information contained in an accurate forecast of solar wind conditions. This is accomplished using a long short-term memory (LSTM) model together with magnetic field measurements made at the Rørvik magnetometer station in Mid-Norway. We use Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) satellite measurements of solar wind and interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) conditions at the first Sun-Earth Lagrange point, and historical lists of coronal mass ejection (CME) impacts at Earth to train and validate the LSTM model. We find that accurate information about the IMF Bz component and solar wind speed are important for obtaining a reasonably accurate (r² ≥ 0.5) forecast of local geomagnetic activity over forecasting horizons beyond ~ 3 h. Information about CME arrival time is only important when simultaneously accompanied by accurate, relatively high-resolution information about IMF Bz. In the absence of the latter, CME arrival time information does not contribute to model performance. This empirical result amounts to a quantitative demonstration of the widely recognized impact of IMF orientation on CME geoeffectiveness. This result also highlights that new innovations, probably in the form of new prediction capabilities of conditions in interplanetary space, will be required to produce accurate forecasts of local geomagnetic disturbances beyond a forecast horizon of 1 h.

Annales GeophysicaeVol. 44(2)
University of Alaska Fairbanks (US), SINTEF (NO), SINTEF Energy Research (NO), Statnett (Norway) (NO), University of Bergen (NO), University of Reading (GB), UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon