P-2199. Impact of Ringer’s Lactate versus Other Fluids in the Hemoconcentration of Children and Adults with Dengue: a Single-Arm Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Abstract Background Dengue fever (DF), an arboviral illness endemic in tropical and subtropical regions, is primarily transmitted by Aedes aegypti and A. albopictus. Hemoconcentration is a critical marker of disease severity, and fluid resuscitation remains the cornerstone of management. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends Ringer’s Lactate (RL) as the first-line intravenous (IV) fluid. However, the comparative effectiveness of RL versus other IV fluids in managing hemoconcentration remains under debate.Figure 1:Forest Plot comparing experimental x controlDelta hematocrit in 1h - RL x DextranFigure 2:Forest Plot comparing experimental x controlDelta hematocrit in 1h - RL x Gelafundin Methods We conducted a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing RL with alternative IV fluids in patients with DF. Databases searched included PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The primary outcome was change in hematocrit (ΔHct) at 1 hour post-fluid resuscitation. Secondary outcomes included hospitalization duration and mortality. Meta-analysis was performed using R software. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane ROB-2 tool.Figure3:Forest Plot comparing experimental x controlDelta hematocrit in 1h - RL x 0.9% Saline Solution Results Five RCTs were included: Dextran vs. RL (n=3 studies): RL was associated with a significantly greater ΔHct (MD = 10.29%; 95% CI: 9.54–11.04; p < 0.01), though heterogeneity was high (I² = 98.3%). Gelafundin vs. RL (n=2): RL showed a favorable ΔHct (MD = 3.72%; 95% CI: 2.71–4.73; p < 0.01) with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 52.9%, p = 0.15). 0.9% Saline vs. RL (n=2): No significant difference was observed (MD = 0.84%; 95% CI: -0.16 to 1.85; p = 0.10; I² = 0%) Conclusion RL demonstrated superior efficacy in improving hemoconcentration compared to Dextran (Figure 1) and Gelafundin (Figure 2). Its performance was comparable to 0.9% saline (Figure 3). These findings support continued use of RL as the WHO-recommended first-line fluid for dengue management. Further trials with standardized protocols are warranted to optimize fluid resuscitation strategies in DF. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.2362
Primary Topic
Mosquito-borne diseases and control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-2199. Impact of Ringer’s Lactate versus Other Fluids in the Hemoconcentration of Children and Adults with Dengue: a Single-Arm Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Thiago Areas Lisboa Netto, G. Carpi, Taniela Marli Bes, Leticia R Campos et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Mosquito-borne diseases and control
article

P-2199. Impact of Ringer’s Lactate versus Other Fluids in the Hemoconcentration of Children and Adults with Dengue: a Single-Arm Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Thiago Areas Lisboa Netto, G. Carpi, Taniela Marli Bes, Leticia R Campos, Oscar Hernández Rios, Jose Luis Boene, Sophia Costa
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Dengue fever (DF), an arboviral illness endemic in tropical and subtropical regions, is primarily transmitted by Aedes aegypti and A. albopictus. Hemoconcentration is a critical marker of disease severity, and fluid resuscitation remains the cornerstone of management. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends Ringer’s Lactate (RL) as the first-line intravenous (IV) fluid. However, the comparative effectiveness of RL versus other IV fluids in managing hemoconcentration remains under debate.Figure 1:Forest Plot comparing experimental x controlDelta hematocrit in 1h - RL x DextranFigure 2:Forest Plot comparing experimental x controlDelta hematocrit in 1h - RL x Gelafundin Methods We conducted a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing RL with alternative IV fluids in patients with DF. Databases searched included PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The primary outcome was change in hematocrit (ΔHct) at 1 hour post-fluid resuscitation. Secondary outcomes included hospitalization duration and mortality. Meta-analysis was performed using R software. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane ROB-2 tool.Figure3:Forest Plot comparing experimental x controlDelta hematocrit in 1h - RL x 0.9% Saline Solution Results Five RCTs were included: Dextran vs. RL (n=3 studies): RL was associated with a significantly greater ΔHct (MD = 10.29%; 95% CI: 9.54–11.04; p < 0.01), though heterogeneity was high (I² = 98.3%). Gelafundin vs. RL (n=2): RL showed a favorable ΔHct (MD = 3.72%; 95% CI: 2.71–4.73; p < 0.01) with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 52.9%, p = 0.15). 0.9% Saline vs. RL (n=2): No significant difference was observed (MD = 0.84%; 95% CI: -0.16 to 1.85; p = 0.10; I² = 0%) Conclusion RL demonstrated superior efficacy in improving hemoconcentration compared to Dextran (Figure 1) and Gelafundin (Figure 2). Its performance was comparable to 0.9% saline (Figure 3). These findings support continued use of RL as the WHO-recommended first-line fluid for dengue management. Further trials with standardized protocols are warranted to optimize fluid resuscitation strategies in DF. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
Universidade de Ribeirão Preto (BR), Eduardo Mondlane University (MZ), MetroWest Medical Center (US), National Institute of Infectious Diseases (JP), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (BR), Universidad Ricardo Palma (PE), Instituto Evandro Chagas (BR), Fundação Hospitalar do Estado de Minas Gerais (BR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Mosquito-borne diseases and control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.