P-420. Trends in Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Hospitalized Children

Abstract Background Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) causes serious infections and is linked to poor outcomes. Although vancomycin is a first-line therapy, salvage therapy with alternatives to vancomycin or combination therapy is often considered for patients with persistent bacteremia. Newer antibiotics have expanded treatment options, but data on their use and variability within pediatrics remain limited. We performed this retrospective study to evaluate changes in MRSA antibiotic treatment choices over time in children.Figure 1Encounters and severity by year.Figure 2MRSA therapy trends by year. Methods We used ICD-10 codes to identify MRSA infections in the Pediatric Health Information System database between January 2016 to December 2024 from children’s hospitals who contributed data for the entire period. Patients were included if hospitalized for a minimum of 3 days and started on anti-MRSA antibiotics (vancomycin, IV clindamycin, ceftaroline, daptomycin, and IV linezolid) within the first 3 hospital days. We excluded patients with Cystic Fibrosis, in the newborn intensive care unit, and receiving only Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. We calculated the number of hospital discharges involving MRSA, including ICU admissions. We also determined the proportion of anti-MRSA days for each antibiotic and used a Chi-square test to compare antibiotic use between 2016 and 2024.Figure 3Boxplot showing variability of anti MRSA agents over 40 hospitals.Figure 4.Boxplot showing distribution of ceftaroline combination therapy use among hospitals by year. Results We analyzed 16,875 encounters from 15,251 patients across 40 children's hospitals, totaling 169,414 MRSA therapy days from 2016–2024 (Figure 1). MRSA hospitalizations fell from 1303 to 932 annually, while ICU admissions rose from 29% to 38% (p< 0.001). Vancomycin (59% to 56%) and IV clindamycin (31% to 14%) use declined, whereas ceftaroline (1% to 13%), IV linezolid (3% to 7%), and daptomycin (4% to 7%) use increased (all p< 0.001) (Figure 2). Combination therapy with ceftaroline and daptomycin or vancomycin rose from 0% to 4% (p< 0.001). Substantial variation in antibiotic use was observed across hospitals (Figures 3, 4). Conclusion Since 2016, MRSA hospitalizations have declined, although ICU admissions have risen. Use of vancomycin and IV clindamycin is decreasing as newer agents become more common. Given variation across hospitals, further research is needed to identify the most effective treatment strategies. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.636
Primary Topic
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-420. Trends in Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Hospitalized Children

Jared Olson, Sirey Zhang, Sonia Mehra, Adam Hersh
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
article

P-420. Trends in Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Hospitalized Children

Jared Olson, Sirey Zhang, Sonia Mehra, Adam Hersh
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) causes serious infections and is linked to poor outcomes. Although vancomycin is a first-line therapy, salvage therapy with alternatives to vancomycin or combination therapy is often considered for patients with persistent bacteremia. Newer antibiotics have expanded treatment options, but data on their use and variability within pediatrics remain limited. We performed this retrospective study to evaluate changes in MRSA antibiotic treatment choices over time in children.Figure 1Encounters and severity by year.Figure 2MRSA therapy trends by year. Methods We used ICD-10 codes to identify MRSA infections in the Pediatric Health Information System database between January 2016 to December 2024 from children’s hospitals who contributed data for the entire period. Patients were included if hospitalized for a minimum of 3 days and started on anti-MRSA antibiotics (vancomycin, IV clindamycin, ceftaroline, daptomycin, and IV linezolid) within the first 3 hospital days. We excluded patients with Cystic Fibrosis, in the newborn intensive care unit, and receiving only Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. We calculated the number of hospital discharges involving MRSA, including ICU admissions. We also determined the proportion of anti-MRSA days for each antibiotic and used a Chi-square test to compare antibiotic use between 2016 and 2024.Figure 3Boxplot showing variability of anti MRSA agents over 40 hospitals.Figure 4.Boxplot showing distribution of ceftaroline combination therapy use among hospitals by year. Results We analyzed 16,875 encounters from 15,251 patients across 40 children's hospitals, totaling 169,414 MRSA therapy days from 2016–2024 (Figure 1). MRSA hospitalizations fell from 1303 to 932 annually, while ICU admissions rose from 29% to 38% (p< 0.001). Vancomycin (59% to 56%) and IV clindamycin (31% to 14%) use declined, whereas ceftaroline (1% to 13%), IV linezolid (3% to 7%), and daptomycin (4% to 7%) use increased (all p< 0.001) (Figure 2). Combination therapy with ceftaroline and daptomycin or vancomycin rose from 0% to 4% (p< 0.001). Substantial variation in antibiotic use was observed across hospitals (Figures 3, 4). Conclusion Since 2016, MRSA hospitalizations have declined, although ICU admissions have risen. Use of vancomycin and IV clindamycin is decreasing as newer agents become more common. Given variation across hospitals, further research is needed to identify the most effective treatment strategies. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
Intermountain Healthcare (US), University of Utah (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.